Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of awhite@bea.com designates
 66.248.192.39 as permitted sender)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <f374e8990706181431w53e4ee53qb5068c3c51792945@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20070615234515.3A44A1A9820@eris.apache.org>
 <7262f25e0706152035x743d3ffbpaf9a85649ea1913@mail.gmail.com>
 <72c1350f0706152154j592ca5eexcf032128a3d86280@mail.gmail.com>
 <f374e8990706181431w53e4ee53qb5068c3c51792945@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <8FB91D8B-6D6B-4704-858C-95BC23E483E0@bea.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Abe White <awhite@bea.com>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r547833 - /openjpa/trunk/openjpa-kernel/pom.xml
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:37:12 -0500
To: dev@openjpa.apache.org


> Mike & Patrick,
> I will move the jaxb dependency from kernel to persistence-jdbc.

This doesn't make any sense to me.  We have a top-level module for  
xml mapping, but it somehow created a JAXB dependency in persistence- 
jdbc?  How did that happen?

And I agree with Michael Dick's latest comment: if this new module  
depends on JDBC, it either needs to go under the JDBC back-end module  
or needs some way to indicate it's a JDBC thing (like having "jdbc"  
in its name).

Maybe it would help if you sent out a more detailed description of  
what depends on what.

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.