openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "catalina wei" <catalina....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
Date Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:28:13 GMT
David,
The jaxb dependency is changed to jaxb 2.0 by David Wisneski.

Catalina

On 6/25/07, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:08 AM, catalina wei wrote:
>
> > David,
> > My XMLMaping test cases run with jaxb 2.0.2.
> > Would jaxb dependency change to jaxb 2.0.2 work for you ?
>
> I think that will work, thanks.  Geronimo is using 2.0.5.  Not sure
> which version EasyBeans/JOnAS may be using.
>
> -David
>
>
> > Catalina
> >
> > On 6/25/07, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey guys, figured this thread belonged here.  See below.
> >>
> >> I looked through the archives to see what the change related to and
> >> it looks like OPENJPA-240 was it.  If we found a way in Geronimo to
> >> force OpenJPA back onto jaxb 2.0 so we could continue to certify
> >> javaee6 would things still work sans this feature?
> >>
> >> Also, any idea how much longer it may be for a 1.0.0 release?
> >>
> >> I know it's tough to balance user and integrator needs, so thanks in
> >> advance for any help.
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
> >> Begin forwarded message:
> >>
> >> > Resent-From: <dblevins@visi.com>
> >> > From: Jeff Genender <jgenender@apache.org>
> >> > Date: June 25, 2007 9:11:11 AM PDT
> >> > To: dev@openejb.apache.org, dev@geronimo.apache.org
> >> > Subject: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
> >> > Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> >> > Reply-To: jgenender@apache.org
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I am sending this to the G and OEJB lists.
> >> >
> >> > We have dependencies on OpenJPA SNAPSHOT in trunk.  Looks like they
> >> > moved to jaxb 2.1 and this is causing troubles with building.
> >> >
> >> > First its having trouble finding javax.xml.stream:stax-api:jar:
> >> 1.0-2,
> >> > and second, I am fairly confident this is going to impact
> >> > certification.
> >> >
> >> > Thoughts?
> >> >
> >> > Jeff
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message