openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Jencks (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-244) Java 2 Security enablement
Date Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:12:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501024
] 

David Jencks commented on OPENJPA-244:
--------------------------------------

Would it make any sense to, rather than having a class with static methods, having an interface/abstract
class and a static INSTANCE?  Then some initialization (static) code could decide which implementation
is appropriate for the environment: e.g. if no security manager is installed we wouldn't need
the doPrivileged code?  I don't know if going through the doPrivileged code when it isn't
doing anything incurs enough expense to make this worthwhile.

> Java 2 Security enablement
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-244
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-244
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.8
>            Reporter: Kevin Sutter
>         Attachments: J2DoPrivHelper.java
>
>
> Via some testing with the WebSphere Application Server, it's been discovered that we're
missing some doPriv blocks through out the OpenJPA code base.  This JIRA report will be used
to resolve these issues.  More specific examples will be posted later.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message