openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eddie O'Neil" <ekon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: First post-graduation OpenJPA release
Date Sun, 20 May 2007 02:15:14 GMT
  +1 -- assuming the code is ready to go, I agree that it's a good
idea to go straight to 1.0.

  +1 as well to waiting until the TLP infrastructure is complete,
which could take a week or more to unbrand from the Incubator, move
the website content, etc.

Eddie



On 5/19/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprudhom@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I personally lean towards just bumping it up to 1.0 and cutting a
> release as soon as possible after we complete the incubator->TLP
> process. A release number < 1.0 suggests to so many people that a
> product is not production-ready, and OpenJPA is so mature and in use
> in so many mission-critical systems that I think we should just bump
> all the open issues to a 1.0.1 or 1.1 release and get a 1.0 release
> out in the public.
>
>
>
> On May 19, 2007, at 4:31 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There's no urgency, but I think we should start discussing what our
> > first release should be out of incubation.
> >
> > Let's take a look at the issues in JIRA and decide if we think that
> > we're ready for a 1.0 release. If not, we can cut a 0.9.8 release
> > and make a list of 1.0 bugs/features to follow.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > Craig Russell
> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message