openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dhrubo <dhrubo.ka...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: First post-graduation OpenJPA release
Date Sun, 20 May 2007 17:28:07 GMT
The documentation probably needs some work. It doesnot look too friendly at
this moment for starters.

~dhrubo

On 5/20/07, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It sounds like there are a bunch of new things that we'll be doing in
> this process; maybe we should do a 0.9.8 first to get the various
> artifacts all sorted out, and then do a 1.0?
>
> -Patrick
>
> On 5/20/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> > that said, this is the OpenJPA project, and no matter what the state
> > of the infra move, anything that this group does now is independent
> > and disconnected from the incuabtor
> >
> >
> > On May 19, 2007, at 10:15 PM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> >
> > >  +1 -- assuming the code is ready to go, I agree that it's a good
> > > idea to go straight to 1.0.
> > >
> > >  +1 as well to waiting until the TLP infrastructure is complete,
> > > which could take a week or more to unbrand from the Incubator, move
> > > the website content, etc.
> > >
> > > Eddie
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/19/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprudhom@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I personally lean towards just bumping it up to 1.0 and cutting a
> > >> release as soon as possible after we complete the incubator->TLP
> > >> process. A release number < 1.0 suggests to so many people that a
> > >> product is not production-ready, and OpenJPA is so mature and in use
> > >> in so many mission-critical systems that I think we should just bump
> > >> all the open issues to a 1.0.1 or 1.1 release and get a 1.0 release
> > >> out in the public.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On May 19, 2007, at 4:31 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > There's no urgency, but I think we should start discussing what our
> > >> > first release should be out of incubation.
> > >> >
> > >> > Let's take a look at the issues in JIRA and decide if we think that
> > >> > we're ready for a 1.0 release. If not, we can cut a 0.9.8 release
> > >> > and make a list of 1.0 bugs/features to follow.
> > >> >
> > >> > Craig
> > >> >
> > >> > Craig Russell
> > >> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/
> > >> products/jdo
> > >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Patrick Linskey
> 202 669 5907
>



-- 
Thanks,
Dhrubo
<a href="http://wkccp.com/gmail/gmail1/gmail.php?user=dhrubo.kayal&gmail.png"></a>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message