openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: First post-graduation OpenJPA release
Date Sun, 20 May 2007 15:07:46 GMT
that said, this is the OpenJPA project, and no matter what the state  
of the infra move, anything that this group does now is independent  
and disconnected from the incuabtor


On May 19, 2007, at 10:15 PM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:

>  +1 -- assuming the code is ready to go, I agree that it's a good
> idea to go straight to 1.0.
>
>  +1 as well to waiting until the TLP infrastructure is complete,
> which could take a week or more to unbrand from the Incubator, move
> the website content, etc.
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
> On 5/19/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprudhom@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I personally lean towards just bumping it up to 1.0 and cutting a
>> release as soon as possible after we complete the incubator->TLP
>> process. A release number < 1.0 suggests to so many people that a
>> product is not production-ready, and OpenJPA is so mature and in use
>> in so many mission-critical systems that I think we should just bump
>> all the open issues to a 1.0.1 or 1.1 release and get a 1.0 release
>> out in the public.
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 19, 2007, at 4:31 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > There's no urgency, but I think we should start discussing what our
>> > first release should be out of incubation.
>> >
>> > Let's take a look at the issues in JIRA and decide if we think that
>> > we're ready for a 1.0 release. If not, we can cut a 0.9.8 release
>> > and make a list of 1.0 bugs/features to follow.
>> >
>> > Craig
>> >
>> > Craig Russell
>> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/ 
>> products/jdo
>> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>> >
>>
>>


Mime
View raw message