From open-jpa-dev-return-3408-apmail-incubator-open-jpa-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Apr 11 21:09:47 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-open-jpa-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 10299 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2007 21:09:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2007 21:09:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 6415 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2007 21:09:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-open-jpa-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6390 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2007 21:09:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact open-jpa-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6381 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2007 21:09:52 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:09:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of kwsutter@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.232 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.232] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.232) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:09:46 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id j2so238429nzf for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:09:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=tIEPy4WJdWA4bpGzTPsqnVelXS1DZgVMsSjgWPMgTRNMH7y4HLx99T/YJKJvDkDQzLjGJIUBubssAj3SPyKcGW5PYXPdzHMf4CqY/NxSSNHZbfw+0OL/BpeP1b3DOFMV+BtnPdVBVbYXzwHuVjySeXHOSaR8etZhGYuSvBtcuT4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Ttif9k54/TG8dd7+K7A8NbVbwSySUGkMGjfGMV+51Now//NW8h/mpu4/aICg4UkTbQ65Auvgr11POLBWB23mr4q2u7Uds90nPU9TVKna8XVh7Qf/CeIUrXFK4Li114XOIgxb+ZRNFJxpTY2pWnRz4jj1O3uhSGRUzoJcFIRCsgs= Received: by 10.114.148.1 with SMTP id v1mr451476wad.1176325765032; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.58.18 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:09:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89c0c52c0704111409q10e949bam684ebe4ddf66d444@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:09:24 -0500 From: "Kevin Sutter" To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: OPENJPA-134 and the 0.9.7 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_17743_20499970.1176325764984" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_17743_20499970.1176325764984 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Question... Now that Abe has graciously resolved OpenJPA-134 ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-134), I would really like to see this get included into the 0.9.7 release. This fix looks to resolve the redundant sql joins that were dogging the performance of certain benchmarks. By including this fix in the 0.9.7 release, I think our OpenJPA story would be all that much better. Since we haven't started a vote yet, are there any issues with either re-cutting the 0.9.7 branch or applying Abe's fix to the 0.9.7 branch before starting a vote? I would assume that neither of these options would cause much headache for Mike (famous last words)... Kevin ------=_Part_17743_20499970.1176325764984--