On 4/12/07, Kevin Sutter wrote: > Armad, > This exception doesn't mean the table doesn't exist in the database, it > means that the metadata doesn't define a proper table for this persistence > type. Either the annotations or the xml are not properly defining the table > for this persistence type. It would be good to see the complete exception > text. Also, the annotated Entity classes and/or the persistence.xml would > help with deciphering this problem. That's almost exactly how I responded to him on the Polish-speaking newsgroup - pl.comp.lang.java. Nice to see I wasn't mistaken. Thanks Kevin! I'd bet that he uses defaults and the class name doesn't correspond to the table name or worse yet, the application doesn't connect to the appropriate schema. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl