openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Date Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:07:26 GMT
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:

> ... but we can run the incubator and the openjpa votes in parallel,
> right? If we're pretty sure that with the removal of that jar,  
> we'll be
> happy, then we could rebuild and start off those two votes at the same
> time.

Yes, this is true.

Craig


>
> -Patrick
>
> -- 
> Patrick Linskey
> BEA Systems, Inc.
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> _
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may  
> contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and   
> affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted   
> and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the  
> individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended  
> recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return  
> this
> by email and then delete it.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 12:30 PM
>> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote:
>>
>>> I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need
>> to resolve
>>> the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the
>> extra jar then
>>> the vote can proceed.
>>>
>>> If I go back and remove the jar, republish etc. I'm assuming we'll
>>> have to restart the clock on the vote, correct me if I'm
>> wrong in this
>>> regard.
>>
>> Yes, changing the bits restarts the clock.
>>
>> Craig
>>>
>>> On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For the record, I'm still
>>>>
>>>> +1 for release.
>>>>
>>>> But if you want to cut another to fix the minor items that
>> have been
>>>> surfaced, it's ok with me.
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mike--
>>>>>
>>>>>  RE the KEYS file, you can just ssh to people.apache.org
>> and check
>>>>> the KEYS file out directly into
>> /www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/
>>>>> directory.  No uploading necessary!  :)
>>>>>
>>>>>  To be sure -- the rest of the items are just nits which could
>>>> mostly
>>>>> be cleaned up just by deleting the directories / files after
>>>> they're
>>>>> uploaded.  I don't have strong feelings about them, so just do
>>>>> whatever the community feels is best.  Certainly, it's
>> fine to ship
>>>>> them for 0.9.7.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Eddie
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/18/07, Michael Dick <michael.d.dick@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks Marc,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/
>>>>>> KEYS ?  The
>>>>>> only documentation I've found indicates that I need to
>> upload it,
>>>>>> but not where the key needs to go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Before I create another release candidate (to remove
>> the docbook
>>>>>> jar), should we try to address the other minor issues?
>> Craig and
>>>>>> Patrick have responded to most of them, but there are a few
>>>>>> others.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Minor issues:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the
>> .md5 and .sha1
>>>>>>> files, which are unnecessary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They're unnecessary, but I've been ignoring them since
>> they aren't
>>>>>> hurting anything. It isn't too hard to get rid of them
>> though. I
>>>>>> think the gpg plugin for maven signs the .md5 and sha1
>> files too
>>>>>> (I'd have to
>>>> check
>>>>>> though).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at:
>>>>>>>  <source-dist>/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that
>> before I create
>>>>>> another release candidate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The other issues Craig and Patrick have responded to.
>> If any of
>>>>>> them can be fixed quickly then we can include them in the new
>>>>>> release
>>>> candidate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprudhom@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make
>>>>>> things a
>>>>>>> little easier to manage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is there because we draw in all the
>> dependencies that we
>>>>>>>>> don't explicitly exclude in the
>> openjpa-project/assembly.xml,
>>>>>>>>> and at some point, someone (probably me) added
>> docbook-xsl as
>>>>>>>>> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing
>>>>>>>>> phase had access to the stylesheets.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is it possible to invert that, so that we only
>> include certain
>>>>>>>> dependencies?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Patrick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Patrick Linskey
>>>>>>>> BEA Systems, Inc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> _
>>>>>>>> _
>>>>>>>> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments,
>>>> may
>>>>>>>> contain
>>>>>>>> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
>>>>>>>> affiliated
>>>>>>>> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,
>>>> copyrighted
>>>>>>>> and/or
>>>>>>>> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the
>> use of the
>>>>>>>> individual or entity named in this message. If you
>> are not the
>>>>>>>> intended recipient, and have received this message
>> in error,
>>>>>>>> please immediately
>>>>>> return
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> by email and then delete it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: Marc Prud'hommeaux
>> [mailto:mprudhomapache@gmail.com] On
>>>>>>>>> Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa
>> 0.9.7-incubating release
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> - The binary distribution contains a new JAR
file whose
>>>>>> license is
>>>>>>>>>>> unclear; this is:
>>>>>>>>>>>   <binary-dist>/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to
build the
>>>>>>>>> docs, but
>>>>>>>>>> not by the runtime.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is there because we draw in all the
>> dependencies that we
>>>>>>>>> don't explicitly exclude in the
>> openjpa-project/assembly.xml,
>>>>>>>>> and at some point, someone (probably me) added
>> docbook-xsl as
>>>>>>>>> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing
>>>>>>>>> phase had access to the stylesheets.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by
>> adding it to
>>>>>>>>> the exclude list (revision 530094).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments,
>>>> may
>>>>>>>> contain information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its
>> subsidiaries
>>>>>>>> and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,
>>>>>> proprietary,
>>>>>>>> copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is
>> intended solely
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> the use of the individual or entity named in this message.
>>>> If you
>>>>>>>> are not the intended recipient, and have received this
>>>> message in
>>>>>>>> error, please immediately return this by email and
>> then delete
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -Michael Dick
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Craig Russell
>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
>> http://java.sun.com/products/
>>>> jdo
>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> -Michael Dick
>>
>> Craig Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/ 
>> jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
>
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may  
> contain information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries   
> and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,   
> copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for  
> the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you  
> are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in  
> error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message