openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Date Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:30:22 GMT
Hi Mike,

On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote:

> I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to  
> resolve the
> issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the extra jar then  
> the vote
> can proceed.
>
> If I go back and remove the jar, republish etc. I'm assuming we'll  
> have to
> restart the clock on the vote, correct me if I'm wrong in this regard.

Yes, changing the bits restarts the clock.

Craig
>
> On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com> wrote:
>>
>> For the record, I'm still
>>
>> +1 for release.
>>
>> But if you want to cut another to fix the minor items that have been
>> surfaced, it's ok with me.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
>>
>> > Mike--
>> >
>> >  RE the KEYS file, you can just ssh to people.apache.org and check
>> > the KEYS file out directly into /www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/
>> > directory.  No uploading necessary!  :)
>> >
>> >  To be sure -- the rest of the items are just nits which could  
>> mostly
>> > be cleaned up just by deleting the directories / files after  
>> they're
>> > uploaded.  I don't have strong feelings about them, so just do
>> > whatever the community feels is best.  Certainly, it's fine to ship
>> > them for 0.9.7.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Eddie
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 4/18/07, Michael Dick <michael.d.dick@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Thanks Marc,
>> >>
>> >> How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/
>> >> KEYS ?  The
>> >> only documentation I've found indicates that I need to upload it,
>> >> but not
>> >> where the key needs to go.
>> >>
>> >> Before I create another release candidate (to remove the docbook
>> >> jar),
>> >> should we try to address the other minor issues? Craig and Patrick
>> >> have
>> >> responded to most of them, but there are a few others.
>> >>
>> >> Minor issues:
>> >>
>> >> - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1
>> >> > files, which are unnecessary.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> They're unnecessary, but I've been ignoring them since they aren't
>> >> hurting
>> >> anything. It isn't too hard to get rid of them though. I think the
>> >> gpg
>> >> plugin for maven signs the .md5 and sha1 files too (I'd have to  
>> check
>> >> though).
>> >>
>> >> - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at:
>> >> >  <source-dist>/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create
>> >> another
>> >> release candidate.
>> >>
>> >> The other issues Craig and Patrick have responded to.  If any of
>> >> them can be
>> >> fixed quickly then we can include them in the new release  
>> candidate.
>> >>
>> >> On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprudhom@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make
>> >> things a
>> >> > little easier to manage.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > >> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that
we
>> >> > >> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml,
>> >> > >> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl
as
>> >> > >> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing
>> >> > >> phase had access to the stylesheets.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain
>> >> > > dependencies?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > -Patrick
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > Patrick Linskey
>> >> > > BEA Systems, Inc.
>> >> > >
>> >>  
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> >> _
>> >> > > _
>> >> > > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments,  
>> may
>> >> > > contain
>> >> > > information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
>> >> > > affiliated
>> >> > > entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,   
>> copyrighted
>> >> > > and/or
>> >> > > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
>> >> > > individual
>> >> > > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
>> >> > > recipient,
>> >> > > and have received this message in error, please immediately
>> >> return
>> >> > > this
>> >> > > by email and then delete it.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> > >> From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:mprudhomapache@gmail.com]
On
>> >> > >> Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux
>> >> > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM
>> >> > >> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>>> - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file
whose
>> >> license is
>> >> > >>>> unclear; this is:
>> >> > >>>>   <binary-dist>/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build
the
>> >> > >> docs, but
>> >> > >>> not by the runtime.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that
we
>> >> > >> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml,
>> >> > >> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl
as
>> >> > >> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing
>> >> > >> phase had access to the stylesheets.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by adding it to
>> >> > >> the exclude list (revision 530094).
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments,  
>> may
>> >> > > contain information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries
>> >> > > and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,
>> >> proprietary,
>> >> > > copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely
>> >> for
>> >> > > the use of the individual or entity named in this message.  
>> If you
>> >> > > are not the intended recipient, and have received this  
>> message in
>> >> > > error, please immediately return this by email and then delete
>> >> it.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> -Michael Dick
>> >>
>>
>> Craig Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/ 
>> jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> -Michael Dick

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message