openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprud...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Date Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:07:35 GMT


Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make things a  
little easier to manage.



On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:

>> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we
>> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml,
>> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as
>> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing
>> phase had access to the stylesheets.
>
> Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain
> dependencies?
>
> -Patrick
>
> -- 
> Patrick Linskey
> BEA Systems, Inc.
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> _
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may  
> contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and   
> affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted   
> and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the  
> individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended  
> recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return  
> this
> by email and then delete it.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:mprudhomapache@gmail.com] On
>> Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM
>> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
>>
>>
>> On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>>
>>>> - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is
>>>> unclear; this is:
>>>>   <binary-dist>/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip
>>>
>>> That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the
>> docs, but
>>> not by the runtime.
>>
>> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we
>> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml,
>> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as
>> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing
>> phase had access to the stylesheets.
>>
>> I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by adding it to
>> the exclude list (revision 530094).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may  
> contain information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries   
> and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,   
> copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for  
> the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you  
> are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in  
> error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.


Mime
View raw message