openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Source license headers in OpenJPA
Date Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:21:48 GMT
Good exercise anyway. I notice you found some files with no license  
headers at all.

Good job.

Craig

On Apr 14, 2007, at 2:57 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:

>
> And that's why vi is the best editor in the world :)
>
>
> On Apr 14, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
>
>>  Nice work -- 26 minutes by my count.  :)
>>
>> Eddie
>>
>>
>> On 4/14/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprudhom@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I just went ahead and manually updated the license headers, just to
>>> get this taken care of quickly.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 14, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Eddie,
>>> >
>>> > Removing Cliff from this discussion; sorry for the spam, Cliff,  
>>> but
>>> > I recall you asking for it... ;-)
>>> >
>>> > On Apr 14, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Craig--
>>> >>
>>> >>  You're quite right; my apologies for not having caught this
>>> >> before now.
>>> >>
>>> >>  Given that this policy went into effect in November 2006,  
>>> IMHO the
>>> >> 0.9.7 release that we're currently reviewing and voting on needs
>>> >> to be
>>> >> updated to include the appropriate headers.
>>> >>
>>> >>  Thoughts?
>>> >
>>> > The Release Manager needs to rescind the vote for 0.9.7 and read
>>> > the document below in detail. It contains references to scripts
>>> > that will update the license headers easier than manually editing
>>> > all the files.
>>> >
>>> > Craig
>>> >>
>>> >> Eddie
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On 4/14/07, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com> wrote:
>>> >>> The license headers we are using are in conflict with current
>>> >>> practice, as documented here:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
>>> >>>
>>> >>> There was a big discussion about this topic, but the above is
>>> >>> normative as of today. See the discussion in this message:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
>>> >>> 200612.mbox/%
>>> >>> 3cc5e632550612201546w570be8cay89abfa43526a33b5@mail.gmail.com%3e
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Bottom line, there should not be a copyright notice in the  
>>> source
>>> >>> headers, only a license notice.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Craig Russell
>>> >>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/
>>> >>> products/jdo
>>> >>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> >>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>> > Craig Russell
>>> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/ 
>>> products/jdo
>>> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message