openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kevin Sutter" <kwsut...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: OPENJPA-134 and the 0.9.7 release
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:37:02 GMT
> > 1. How good is the patch? Has it been put through whatever extensive
> > Unit Tests tests anyone has?
>
> It passes all the OpenJPA tests against Derby and HSQL. It also passes
> some other integration tests as well.


It also works with DB2.  I haven't been able to check out the performance
benchmark yet, but functionally, it looks good.

> 2. How easy is it to respin the release? I'd hope that this is a
> > matter of a few hours but I'm not the one doing the work ;-)
>
> It shouldn't be hard. Grabbing the feature is probably the harder part,
> and making the decision about whether to just throw away the branch and
> re-branch or pick up the one feature.


I've already started this conversation with Mike.  He agrees that it's
probably the right thing to do (to pick up openjpa-134), so he's willing to
eat the extra work.

Kevin


>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 2:32 PM
> > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: OPENJPA-134 and the 0.9.7 release
> >
> > Generally in favor of including this performance patch with the
> > release. Just a few questions:
> >
> > 1. How good is the patch? Has it been put through whatever extensive
> > Unit Tests tests anyone has?
> >
> > 2. How easy is it to respin the release? I'd hope that this is a
> > matter of a few hours but I'm not the one doing the work ;-)
> >
> > Procedurally there is no issue since Mike hasn't yet called
> > for a vote.
> >
> > I'd be happy if the patch were included in the release candidate
> > because it's the release candidate that the community should be
> > testing. And if this patch has any issues, we'll hear about it.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > On Apr 11, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
> >
> > > Question...
> > >
> > > Now that Abe has graciously resolved OpenJPA-134 (
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-134), I would really
> > > like to
> > > see this get included into the 0.9.7 release.  This fix looks to
> > > resolve the
> > > redundant sql joins that were dogging the performance of certain
> > > benchmarks.  By including this fix in the 0.9.7 release, I think
> > > our OpenJPA
> > > story would be all that much better.
> > >
> > > Since we haven't started a vote yet, are there any issues
> > with either
> > > re-cutting the 0.9.7 branch or applying Abe's fix to the 0.9.7
> > > branch before
> > > starting a vote?  I would assume that neither of these options
> > > would cause
> > > much headache for Mike (famous last words)...
> > >
> > > Kevin
> >
> > Craig Russell
> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >
> >
>
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or
> entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and
> have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email
> and then delete it.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message