openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Patrick Linskey (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-182) db2 update lock syntax WITH <isolation> USE AND KEEP UPDATE LOCKS
Date Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:45:32 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12486821
] 

Patrick Linskey commented on OPENJPA-182:
-----------------------------------------

It's probably worth noting that everything in the FetchPlan is configurable via the Query.setHint()
APIs. My earlier theoretical test case would become:

Query q = em.createQuery(...);
q.setHint("openjpa.FetchPlan.IsolationLevel", Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE);
q.setHint("openjpa.FetchPlan.ReadLockMode", LockModeType.WRITE);
List l = q.getResultList(); 

In other words, if we use the patch that I attached (or something like it), we will end up
with strong typing, API alignment with similar concepts, and dynamic accessibility both in
terms of Query.setHint() and @QueryHints annotations / query-hint XML.

> db2 update lock syntax  WITH <isolation> USE AND KEEP UPDATE LOCKS
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-182
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-182
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: jdbc
>         Environment: db2 database driver for zOS, AS400, Unix, Windows, Linux
>            Reporter: David Wisneski
>         Assigned To: David Wisneski
>         Attachments: OPENJPA-182.patch, openJPA182.patch
>
>
> A while back we changed the syntax of update locking from FOR UPDATE OF  to  WITH RS
USE AND KEEP UPDATE LOCKS.   Additional changes are required because 
> 1.  if isolation=serializable is configured, then the syntax should be  WITH RR USE AND
KEEP UDPATE LOCKS
> 2.  when using DB2/400 on iSeries machines, the syntax is WITH RS USE AND KEEP EXCLUSIVE
LOCKS  or WITH RR USE AND KEEP EXCLUSIVE LOCKS because DB2/400 only supports read or exclusive
locks. 
> 3.  DB2 supports both a FETCH FIRST  ROWS and update LOCKS clauses.
> So we change supportsLockingWithSelectRange = true in the AbstractDB2Dictionary class
and change the DB2Dictionary to append the correct LOCKS syntax depending on vendor, release
and isolation level.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message