openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Patrick Linskey" <plins...@bea.com>
Subject RE: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Date Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:45:30 GMT
> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we 
> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, 
> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as 
> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing 
> phase had access to the stylesheets.

Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain
dependencies?

-Patrick

-- 
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:mprudhomapache@gmail.com] On 
> Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
> 
> 
> On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
> 
> >> - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is 
> >> unclear; this is:
> >>   <binary-dist>/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip
> >
> > That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the 
> docs, but 
> > not by the runtime.
> 
> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we 
> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, 
> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as 
> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing 
> phase had access to the stylesheets.
> 
> I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by adding it to 
> the exclude list (revision 530094).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information  of  BEA
Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,
 copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received
this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.

Mime
View raw message