openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Patrick Linskey" <plins...@bea.com>
Subject RE: OPENJPA-134 and the 0.9.7 release
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:24:15 GMT
> 1. How good is the patch? Has it been put through whatever extensive  
> Unit Tests tests anyone has?

It passes all the OpenJPA tests against Derby and HSQL. It also passes
some other integration tests as well.

> 2. How easy is it to respin the release? I'd hope that this is a  
> matter of a few hours but I'm not the one doing the work ;-)

It shouldn't be hard. Grabbing the feature is probably the harder part,
and making the decision about whether to just throw away the branch and
re-branch or pick up the one feature.

-Patrick

-- 
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc. 

_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 2:32 PM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: OPENJPA-134 and the 0.9.7 release
> 
> Generally in favor of including this performance patch with the  
> release. Just a few questions:
> 
> 1. How good is the patch? Has it been put through whatever extensive  
> Unit Tests tests anyone has?
> 
> 2. How easy is it to respin the release? I'd hope that this is a  
> matter of a few hours but I'm not the one doing the work ;-)
> 
> Procedurally there is no issue since Mike hasn't yet called 
> for a vote.
> 
> I'd be happy if the patch were included in the release candidate  
> because it's the release candidate that the community should be  
> testing. And if this patch has any issues, we'll hear about it.
> 
> Craig
> 
> On Apr 11, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
> 
> > Question...
> >
> > Now that Abe has graciously resolved OpenJPA-134 (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-134), I would really  
> > like to
> > see this get included into the 0.9.7 release.  This fix looks to  
> > resolve the
> > redundant sql joins that were dogging the performance of certain
> > benchmarks.  By including this fix in the 0.9.7 release, I think  
> > our OpenJPA
> > story would be all that much better.
> >
> > Since we haven't started a vote yet, are there any issues 
> with either
> > re-cutting the 0.9.7 branch or applying Abe's fix to the 0.9.7  
> > branch before
> > starting a vote?  I would assume that neither of these options  
> > would cause
> > much headache for Mike (famous last words)...
> >
> > Kevin
> 
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> 
> 

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information  of  BEA
Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,
 copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received
this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.

Mime
View raw message