openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Patrick Linskey" <plins...@bea.com>
Subject RE: Artifact names
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:07:06 GMT
> Does anyone vehemently object to putting -project back into 
> the names for
> the 0.9.7 release?

I don't vehemently object for the 0.9.7 release, but I do vehemently
object for the 1.0 release. I don't like these random bugs / limitations
of our build process making their way into the project artifacts.

> I searched through the users@maven.apache.org mailing list 
> archives and it
> turns out this is a fairly common problem - usually resulting 
> in a response
> of "working as designed".  Here's an example
> http://www.nabble.com/Installation-and-deployment-tf1449780s17
> 7.html#a3916784

Any chance that we can convince the people involved that while it may be
working as designed, it's a common difficulty? 

-Patrick

-- 
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc. 

_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Dick [mailto:michael.d.dick@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 8:34 AM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Artifact names
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm hitting a bit of a snag with the staging repository for 
> release 0.9.7.
> Recently we made changes to remove -project from our the zip 
> file names. The
> problem is that the maven install and deploy goals ignore the names we
> provide and generate their own names (
> openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-xxx.zip).
> 
> I searched through the users@maven.apache.org mailing list 
> archives and it
> turns out this is a fairly common problem - usually resulting 
> in a response
> of "working as designed".  Here's an example
> http://www.nabble.com/Installation-and-deployment-tf1449780s17
> 7.html#a3916784
> 
> Does anyone vehemently object to putting -project back into 
> the names for
> the 0.9.7 release?
> 
> The only other way I know of to fix the names that get 
> deployed would be to
> change the artifactId in the pom files (basically switch openjpa with
> openjpa-project). Switching the names will impact anyone who has a
> dependency on the base openjpa project. They'll have to 
> update the version
> number anyway, but it will still be a little confusing if they used to
> depend on openjpa-0.9.6 and now they depend on openjpa-project-0.9.7.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> -Michael Dick
> 

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information  of  BEA
Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,
 copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received
this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.

Mime
View raw message