openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Patrick Linskey" <plins...@bea.com>
Subject RE: [VOTE] ArgumentException : More parameters were passed to execute() than were declared
Date Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:58:02 GMT
> How do I create a goal in JIRA? I don't seem to have access 
> to do so, but
> I'm using the same ID that I had before I became a committer. 
> It happens to
> be the same username as my Apache account, is there something 
> I need to do
> to "link" them?

I just added you to the openjpa-developers JIRA group, and added you as
a "Committer" in the OpenJPA Project Roles administration setting. That
gives you nearly the same amount of control as I have, and I was able to
add new milestones somehow via the project administration page (you can
get there via the Administration tab on the top bar). Let me know if
that works out.

I'm not really sure what the different JIRA security model options that
we're using all boil down to, so I'm kinda just trying out different
settings here.

-Patrick

-- 
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc. 

_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Dick [mailto:michael.d.dick@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 11:47 AM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] ArgumentException : More parameters were 
> passed to execute() than were declared
> 
> On 4/2/07, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@bea.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I have no problem adding this to the release. I was hoping to get
> > > OpenJPA-185 and OpenJPA-179 in as soon as I got commit
> > > access, and then start the release process.
> >
> > You should have commit access now.
> >
> > > Is there anything else that we need to get in? If these are
> > > the only changes
> > > we need, I'll go ahead and start the release this afternoon.
> >
> > I think that the next step is to create an 0.9.8 goal 
> within JIRA and
> > move everything except those things we plan for 0.9.7 out 
> to 0.9.8. Once
> > we've done that and resolved all the 0.9.7 issues, we 
> should be ready to
> > build a release.
> 
> 
> How do I create a goal in JIRA? I don't seem to have access 
> to do so, but
> I'm using the same ID that I had before I became a committer. 
> It happens to
> be the same username as my Apache account, is there something 
> I need to do
> to "link" them?
> 
> 
> I'm assuming that you've got the link to the release process that Marc
> > put together, right?
> 
> 
> Yes, I've been going through that and the Apache 
> documentation this morning.
> 
> 
> -Patrick
> >
> > --
> > Patrick Linskey
> > BEA Systems, Inc.
> >
> > 
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, 
> may contain
> > information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and 
>  affiliated
> > entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  
> copyrighted  and/or
> > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of 
> the individual
> > or entity named in this message. If you are not the 
> intended recipient,
> > and have received this message in error, please immediately 
> return this
> > by email and then delete it.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Michael Dick [mailto:michael.d.dick@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:58 AM
> > > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] ArgumentException : More parameters were
> > > passed to execute() than were declared
> > >
> > > I have no problem adding this to the release. I was hoping to get
> > > OpenJPA-185 and OpenJPA-179 in as soon as I got commit
> > > access, and then
> > > start the release process.
> > >
> > > Is there anything else that we need to get in? If these are
> > > the only changes
> > > we need, I'll go ahead and start the release this afternoon.
> > >
> > > On 4/2/07, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@bea.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't think that it's been cut yet. Mike: where do we 
> stand on the
> > > > 0.9.7 process?
> > > >
> > > > -Patrick
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Patrick Linskey
> > > > BEA Systems, Inc.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > _________
> > > > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments,
> > > may contain
> > > > information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
> > >  affiliated
> > > > entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,
> > > copyrighted  and/or
> > > > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of
> > > the individual
> > > > or entity named in this message. If you are not the
> > > intended recipient,
> > > > and have received this message in error, please immediately
> > > return this
> > > > by email and then delete it.
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:dain@iq80.com]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 9:23 AM
> > > > > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] ArgumentException : More parameters were
> > > > > passed to execute() than were declared
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this something we can put in 0.9.7 or has that been
> > > cut already?
> > > > >
> > > > > -dain
> > > > >
> > > > > On Apr 1, 2007, at 10:07 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 to remove the restriction. As long as no parameters are
> > > > > missing,
> > > > > > the query should be considered sufficient.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Craig
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Apr 1, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Seem fair enough to get rid of the description. I've opened
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-196
> > > describing the
> > > > > >> issue.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> +1 from me to remove the restriction that there be exactly
> > > > > as many
> > > > > >> positional parameters declared as were assigned.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Mar 31, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Actually, I think there is a bigger problem...  
> Say I have a
> > > > > >>> query like this:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>     SELECT x FROM foo AS x WHERE foo.name = ?2
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> The 
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.QueryImpl.assertParameters(...)
> > > > > >>> code assumes that if I have 1 parameter it is numbered
> > > > > ?1, but in
> > > > > >>> EJB 2.1 this was not a requirement and there are 
> certification
> > > > > >>> tests that verify you are allowed to have 
> "unused" parameters
> > > > > >>> (e.g, in my example about ?1 and ?N where N>2 are
all not
> > > > > used).
> > > > > >>> I couldn't find any text in the specification that
> > > says that all
> > > > > >>> all positional parameters must be used in the 
> query, but I did
> > > > > >>> find text that say the EJB-QL 3.0 language is an
> > > > > extension of the
> > > > > >>> EJB-QL 2.1 language:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> "The Java Persistence query language is an 
> extension of the
> > > > > >>> Enterprise Java Beans query language, EJB QL, 
> definedin[5]."
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> So I think we must remove the "extra-params" check,
> > > but I would
> > > > > >>> be happy with a "don't check for extra-params flag".
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> -dain
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Mar 31, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I'm working on a CMP 2 implementation that delegates
> > > to OpenJPA
> > > > > >>>> for persistence.  I'm running into a problem 
> where I get the
> > > > > >>>> following exception:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.ArgumentException
: More
> > > > > >>>> parameters were passed to execute() than were declared:
4
> > > > > >>>> parameters were specified for query execution, but
only 2
> > > > > >>>> parameters were declared in the query.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> In CMP you declare finder and select methods that
have
> > > > > >>>> parameters which are passed into the query engine.
 You
> > > > > can have
> > > > > >>>> as many parameters as you like but are not required
> > > to use them
> > > > > >>>> all, but it appears that OpenJPA is enforcing a

> restriction
> > > > > >>>> where if the EJB-QL text only lists say 2 parameters
and
> > > > > I set 4
> > > > > >>>> I get the above exception.  In order of perference:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Is this spec required? If not, can we remove the
check?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Is there a way to disable the check?  If so, how?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Is there a way to determine the number of 
> paramters a query
> > > > > >>>> takes?  If so, I can change my code.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Is there a way to get the ejbql text from a Query
> > > > > object? If so,
> > > > > >>>> I'll write a quick parser to determine number of
> > > queries myself.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> BTW, I'm currently using 0.9.6.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> -dain
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Craig Russell
> > > > > > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
> > > > > http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> > > > > > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > > > > > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments,
> > > may contain
> > > > information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
> > >  affiliated
> > > > entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,
> > > copyrighted  and/or
> > > > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of
> > > the individual or
> > > > entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> > > recipient, and
> > > > have received this message in error, please immediately
> > > return this by email
> > > > and then delete it.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -Michael Dick
> > >
> >
> > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, 
> may contain
> > information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and 
>  affiliated
> > entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  
> copyrighted  and/or
> > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of 
> the individual or
> > entity named in this message. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, and
> > have received this message in error, please immediately 
> return this by email
> > and then delete it.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -Michael Dick
> 

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information  of  BEA
Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,
 copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received
this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.

Mime
View raw message