openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Dick" <michael.d.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESCINDED] [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Date Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:58:48 GMT
Sorry, I meant to send this out sooner but I'm rescinding this vote. The
docbook jar needs to be removed and we need to resolve the problem with DB2.


On 4/19/07, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> I agree that the problem with sub-selects on DB2 seems significant
> enough to stop the release.
>
> Craig
>
> On Apr 19, 2007, at 7:52 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
>
> > Another alternative is to back out the changes for OPENJPA-182
> > until we get
> > the complete solution..  But, looking at the changes for
> > OPENJPA-182, that
> > looks to be quite the job and I'm not sure how many of these parts
> > have been
> > touched since that commit...  I would rather wait until OPENJPA-222
> > tests
> > clean and then go forward with another vote...  But, I am open to
> > other
> > suggestions.
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > On 4/19/07, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Craig and others,
> >> Here's the scoop with OPENJPA-222...  A couple of weeks ago, DaveW
> >> committed some changes to OPENJPA-182.  Patrick reviewed the
> >> changes and
> >> through discussions on the dev mailing list and the Issue itself,
> >> re-worked
> >> and re-committed the changes.  We dropped the ball and didn't
> >> sufficiently
> >> test these new changes against DB2 until recently.  We are finding
> >> that
> >> basically any sub-selects will not work with DB2 with the changes for
> >> OPENJPA-182.  The changes for OPENJPA-222 will resolve these issues.
> >>
> >> This problem (no sub-selects with DB2) seems severe enough to
> >> warrant a
> >> re-spin of the release.  I know this pushes us out another couple
> >> of days,
> >> but I think from a "customer perspective", it's worth the effort.
> >>
> >> As far as this 0.9.7 being bundled with some significant
> >> release...  We
> >> (IBM) were planning to use the 0.9.7 release with a refresh of the
> >> EJB3
> >> Feature Pack.  Our plans have since changed, so the urgency is no
> >> longer
> >> present.  I just want any OpenJPA release to be usable and not
> >> regress
> >> expected function.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Kevin
> >>
> >> On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > This isn't the last release of openjpa. What is the urgency for
> >> > fixing this before our major event (the last release before exiting
> >> > the incubator)?
> >> >
> >> > Is this release planned to be bundled with some other significant
> >> > release?
> >> >
> >> > Craig
> >> >
> >> > On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Michael Dick wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I probably should have worded that differently since I haven't
> >> run
> >> > > the tests
> >> > > against DB2. I believe Dave's team has.
> >> > >
> >> > > Dave, can you comment on how big the impact of OpenJPA-222 is?
> >> > >
> >> > > On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@bea.com> wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with
> >> > >>> Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like
to
> >> > >>> get that issue resolved if possible.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I'm a little nervous about scope creep. Is there some good
> >> reason why
> >> >
> >> > >> OPENJPA-222 needs to be resolved now vs. later?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> -Patrick
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> Patrick Linskey
> >> > >> BEA Systems, Inc.
> >> > >>
> >> _____________________________________________________________________
> >> >
> >> > >> __
> >> > >> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
> >> > >> contain
> >> > >> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
> >> > >> affiliated
> >> > >> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
> >> > >> and/or
> >> > >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> >> > >> individual
> >> > >> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> >> > >> recipient,
> >> > >> and have received this message in error, please immediately
> >> return
> >> > >> this
> >> > >> by email and then delete it.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > >> > From: Michael Dick [mailto:michael.d.dick@gmail.com ]
> >> > >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:24 PM
> >> > >> > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprudhom@apache.org>
wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Michael-
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > > I'd rather not cut another release, but I think
we do
> >> need to
> >> > >> > > > resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can
live
> >> with the
> >> >
> >> > >> > > > extra jar then the vote can proceed.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Personally, I think it is sufficiently ugly to release
> >> with the
> >> > >> > > docbook jar to justify starting another release.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > However, if others disagree, I'll happily accede to the
> >> > >> majority. For
> >> > >> > > now, my vote changes to +0.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > I agree but like you I can be talked out of it. I'll
take
> >> > >> > another look
> >> > >> > over everything and start another release tonight / tomorrow.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with
> >> > >> > Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like
to
> >> > >> > get that issue resolved if possible.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > --
> >> > >> > -Michael Dick
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
> >> > >> contain
> >> > >> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
> >> > >> affiliated
> >> > >> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
> >> > >> and/or
> >> > >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> >> > >> individual or
> >> > >> entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> >> > >> recipient, and
> >> > >> have received this message in error, please immediately return
> >> > >> this by email
> >> > >> and then delete it.
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > -Michael Dick
> >> >
> >> > Craig Russell
> >> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/
> >> products/jdo
> >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
>


-- 
-Michael Dick

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message