openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Dick" <michael.d.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Date Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:40:52 GMT
I probably should have worded that differently since I haven't run the tests
against DB2. I believe Dave's team has.

Dave, can you comment on how big the impact of OpenJPA-222 is?

On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@bea.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with
> > Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to
> > get that issue resolved if possible.
>
> I'm a little nervous about scope creep. Is there some good reason why
> OPENJPA-222 needs to be resolved now vs. later?
>
> -Patrick
>
> --
> Patrick Linskey
> BEA Systems, Inc.
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
> by email and then delete it.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Dick [mailto:michael.d.dick@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:24 PM
> > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
> >
> > On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprudhom@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Michael-
> > >
> > > On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to
> > > > resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the
> > > > extra jar then the vote can proceed.
> > >
> > > Personally, I think it is sufficiently ugly to release with the
> > > docbook jar to justify starting another release.
> >
> > However, if others disagree, I'll happily accede to the majority. For
> > > now, my vote changes to +0.
> > >
> > >
> > > I agree but like you I can be talked out of it. I'll take
> > another look
> > over everything and start another release tonight / tomorrow.
> >
> > I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with
> > Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to
> > get that issue resolved if possible.
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Michael Dick
> >
>
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or
> entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and
> have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email
> and then delete it.
>



-- 
-Michael Dick

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message