openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Dick" <michael.d.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: OPENJPA-134 and the 0.9.7 release
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:11:15 GMT
On 4/11/07, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > 1. How good is the patch? Has it been put through whatever extensive
> > > Unit Tests tests anyone has?
> >
> > It passes all the OpenJPA tests against Derby and HSQL. It also passes
> > some other integration tests as well.
>
>
> It also works with DB2.  I haven't been able to check out the performance
> benchmark yet, but functionally, it looks good.
>
> > 2. How easy is it to respin the release? I'd hope that this is a
> > > matter of a few hours but I'm not the one doing the work ;-)
> >
> > It shouldn't be hard. Grabbing the feature is probably the harder part,
> > and making the decision about whether to just throw away the branch and
> > re-branch or pick up the one feature.
>
>
> I've already started this conversation with Mike.  He agrees that it's
> probably the right thing to do (to pick up openjpa-134), so he's willing
> to
> eat the extra work.


It actually shouldn't be too bad. I'm going to start over from with a new
openjpa-0.9.7-RC1 branch though - might as well get the rest of the fixes
too.


Kevin
>
>
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 2:32 PM
> > > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: OPENJPA-134 and the 0.9.7 release
> > >
> > > Generally in favor of including this performance patch with the
> > > release. Just a few questions:
> > >
> > > 1. How good is the patch? Has it been put through whatever extensive
> > > Unit Tests tests anyone has?
> > >
> > > 2. How easy is it to respin the release? I'd hope that this is a
> > > matter of a few hours but I'm not the one doing the work ;-)
> > >
> > > Procedurally there is no issue since Mike hasn't yet called
> > > for a vote.
> > >
> > > I'd be happy if the patch were included in the release candidate
> > > because it's the release candidate that the community should be
> > > testing. And if this patch has any issues, we'll hear about it.
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > > On Apr 11, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
> > >
> > > > Question...
> > > >
> > > > Now that Abe has graciously resolved OpenJPA-134 (
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-134), I would really
> > > > like to
> > > > see this get included into the 0.9.7 release.  This fix looks to
> > > > resolve the
> > > > redundant sql joins that were dogging the performance of certain
> > > > benchmarks.  By including this fix in the 0.9.7 release, I think
> > > > our OpenJPA
> > > > story would be all that much better.
> > > >
> > > > Since we haven't started a vote yet, are there any issues
> > > with either
> > > > re-cutting the 0.9.7 branch or applying Abe's fix to the 0.9.7
> > > > branch before
> > > > starting a vote?  I would assume that neither of these options
> > > > would cause
> > > > much headache for Mike (famous last words)...
> > > >
> > > > Kevin
> > >
> > > Craig Russell
> > > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> > > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> > information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
> > entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
> > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
> or
> > entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and
> > have received this message in error, please immediately return this by
> email
> > and then delete it.
> >
>



-- 
-Michael Dick

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message