openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Dick" <michael.d.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Artifact names
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:08:12 GMT
You're right, if / when we bypass the deploy phase and execute scp (or
something similar) ourselves then it'll be easy to put in the renaming
logic.

Thanks Patrick and Marc,

On 4/11/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprudhom@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Michael-
>
> I personally think that keeping "-project-" in the artifact zip name
> is tolerable. I too had looked around (albeit briefly) for a solution
> to this a while ago, and found none.
>
> Once OpenJPA is out of incubation and we are deploying releases to
> the Apache mirror system, we'll probably need to put in some more
> deployment-oriented logic that doesn't use the "deploy" phase, so at
> that time we might be able to put in some renaming logic.
>
> +1 for tolerating the artifact name "openjpa-project-0.9.7-
> incubating.zip".
>
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Michael Dick wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm hitting a bit of a snag with the staging repository for release
> > 0.9.7.
> > Recently we made changes to remove -project from our the zip file
> > names. The
> > problem is that the maven install and deploy goals ignore the names we
> > provide and generate their own names (
> > openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating-xxx.zip).
> >
> > I searched through the users@maven.apache.org mailing list archives
> > and it
> > turns out this is a fairly common problem - usually resulting in a
> > response
> > of "working as designed".  Here's an example
> > http://www.nabble.com/Installation-and-deployment-
> > tf1449780s177.html#a3916784
> >
> > Does anyone vehemently object to putting -project back into the
> > names for
> > the 0.9.7 release?
> >
> > The only other way I know of to fix the names that get deployed
> > would be to
> > change the artifactId in the pom files (basically switch openjpa with
> > openjpa-project). Switching the names will impact anyone who has a
> > dependency on the base openjpa project. They'll have to update the
> > version
> > number anyway, but it will still be a little confusing if they used to
> > depend on openjpa-0.9.6 and now they depend on openjpa-project-0.9.7.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > -Michael Dick
>
> --
-Michael Dick

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message