openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
Date Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:17:37 GMT
For the record, I'm still

+1 for release.

But if you want to cut another to fix the minor items that have been  
surfaced, it's ok with me.

Craig

On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:

> Mike--
>
>  RE the KEYS file, you can just ssh to people.apache.org and check
> the KEYS file out directly into /www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/
> directory.  No uploading necessary!  :)
>
>  To be sure -- the rest of the items are just nits which could mostly
> be cleaned up just by deleting the directories / files after they're
> uploaded.  I don't have strong feelings about them, so just do
> whatever the community feels is best.  Certainly, it's fine to ship
> them for 0.9.7.
>
> Cheers,
> Eddie
>
>
>
> On 4/18/07, Michael Dick <michael.d.dick@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Marc,
>>
>> How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ 
>> KEYS ?  The
>> only documentation I've found indicates that I need to upload it,  
>> but not
>> where the key needs to go.
>>
>> Before I create another release candidate (to remove the docbook  
>> jar),
>> should we try to address the other minor issues? Craig and Patrick  
>> have
>> responded to most of them, but there are a few others.
>>
>> Minor issues:
>>
>> - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1
>> > files, which are unnecessary.
>>
>>
>> They're unnecessary, but I've been ignoring them since they aren't  
>> hurting
>> anything. It isn't too hard to get rid of them though. I think the  
>> gpg
>> plugin for maven signs the .md5 and sha1 files too (I'd have to check
>> though).
>>
>> - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at:
>> >  <source-dist>/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log
>>
>>
>> This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create  
>> another
>> release candidate.
>>
>> The other issues Craig and Patrick have responded to.  If any of  
>> them can be
>> fixed quickly then we can include them in the new release candidate.
>>
>> On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <mprudhom@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make  
>> things a
>> > little easier to manage.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>> >
>> > >> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we
>> > >> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml,
>> > >> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as
>> > >> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing
>> > >> phase had access to the stylesheets.
>> > >
>> > > Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain
>> > > dependencies?
>> > >
>> > > -Patrick
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Patrick Linskey
>> > > BEA Systems, Inc.
>> > >  
>> _____________________________________________________________________ 
>> _
>> > > _
>> > > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
>> > > contain
>> > > information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
>> > > affiliated
>> > > entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
>> > > and/or
>> > > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
>> > > individual
>> > > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
>> > > recipient,
>> > > and have received this message in error, please immediately  
>> return
>> > > this
>> > > by email and then delete it.
>> > >
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:mprudhomapache@gmail.com] On
>> > >> Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux
>> > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM
>> > >> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>>> - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose  
>> license is
>> > >>>> unclear; this is:
>> > >>>>   <binary-dist>/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip
>> > >>>
>> > >>> That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the
>> > >> docs, but
>> > >>> not by the runtime.
>> > >>
>> > >> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we
>> > >> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml,
>> > >> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as
>> > >> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing
>> > >> phase had access to the stylesheets.
>> > >>
>> > >> I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by adding it to
>> > >> the exclude list (revision 530094).
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
>> > > contain information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries
>> > > and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,   
>> proprietary,
>> > > copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely  
>> for
>> > > the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you
>> > > are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in
>> > > error, please immediately return this by email and then delete  
>> it.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Michael Dick
>>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message