Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-open-jpa-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 84165 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2007 01:38:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2007 01:38:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 64245 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2007 01:38:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-open-jpa-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64221 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2007 01:38:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact open-jpa-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64208 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2007 01:38:46 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:38:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of kwsutter@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.175] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:38:38 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so87473uge for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:38:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=o9zff68WIFWZS+vm2tiQA9ssjbzMLcNG64Dijl2t/KgUi0XomVVlnh9VnCBUuDondxNfJJxR/6XEI8brejd62PRyx1mF/mriWb9CA8fPqnMet374jSpoyo8+JnY09LuunoKd1ZCp+Wd3oB3n60GoVjJcRodCiDhYgQRvSDz7Qw4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Is7rDzIKKbTfKZLNws7jSzMKU09Cvs309VTXVStE2t/bmRtgSSfakyCqMrCDiJjfdTUn3mmLjolIre+oqL1gJvCA0g9N9qIZlwSjTvzX/iZmzZgQb2haVYyO8BoPNVmlx+yVJ7uaqrZjKzCraPlx1E3PkVF+iSUGdfPgLxniu3w= Received: by 10.114.159.1 with SMTP id h1mr3435084wae.1175045895449; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.58.18 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89c0c52c0703271838l1a5514b4ud5d96a9800769854@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:38:15 -0500 From: "Kevin Sutter" To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: 0.9.7 release In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_22367_3464313.1175045895367" References: <7D856CDFE035FF45A0420ACBD71BDD6303AEC2B0@repbex02.amer.bea.com> <89c0c52c0703271409m59c2d7bax705fb93d6fd74739@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_22367_3464313.1175045895367 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Fair enough. Cutting a candidate release would be a good way to provide the "deadline". This would allow any in-flight Issues to be resolved before we make this 0.9.7 final. Kevin On 3/27/07, Craig L Russell wrote: > > I hate to bring this up, but it takes more than a day or two to cut a > release and have it approved. Take a look at the 0.9.6 release. > Granted, we're smarter than that now, but it still takes some time. > > Let's say we built a candidate release right now. You want to give > the community a chance to find issues with it or to complain that bug > xyz hasn't been fixed or that they found a regression. It might take > a few days to get the feedback and then all weekend to come up with a > new candidate. Then, you need to ask the Incubator for permission to > release, which takes a minimum of 3 days (72 hours). You're now into > the middle of next week. If the incubator folks find anything, it's > another spin of the wheel. > > Craig > > On Mar 27, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote: > > > Patrick, > > I tend to agree. Just to give us a little bit of time to wrap up a > > couple > > of fixes for pending Issues, how about if we set Thursday or Friday > > as the > > deadline for the 0.9.7 release? > > > > Kevin > > > > On 3/27/07, Patrick Linskey wrote: > >> > >> I don't think that any of the pending 0.9.7 issues are > >> showstoppers; if > >> we want to create a 0.9.7 release ASAP, I'd be content with all of > >> the > >> 0.9.7 issues being moved out to 0.9.8. > >> > >> -Patrick > >> > >> -- > >> Patrick Linskey > >> BEA Systems, Inc. > >> > >> _____________________________________________________________________ > >> __ > >> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may > >> contain > >> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and > >> affiliated > >> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted > >> and/or > >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the > >> individual > >> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended > >> recipient, > >> and have received this message in error, please immediately return > >> this > >> by email and then delete it. > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:mprudhomapache@gmail.com] On > >> > Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux > >> > Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:39 AM > >> > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> > Subject: Re: 0.9.7 release > >> > > >> > Matthieu- > >> > > >> > I don't think we have any date estimates yet. Craig was going to > >> put > >> > together the beginnings of a roadmap summary that should be useful > >> > for this. > >> > > >> > Looking at the JIRA roadmap for OpenJPA (http://issues.apache.org/ > >> > jira/browse/OPENJPA? > >> > report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel), we > >> > have a pretty ambition list of fixes for 0.9.7. If your ODE release > >> > is being blocked, I wonder if it would make sense to bump > >> everything > >> > up a release (0.9.7 issues go to 0.9.8, and 0.9.8 goes to 0.9.9) > >> and > >> > cut a release sooner rather than later. > >> > > >> > Thoughts anyone? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mar 26, 2007, at 11:54 AM, Matthieu Riou wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi guys, > >> > > > >> > > We've started preparing an incubator release for ODE and we're > >> now > >> > > using > >> > > OpenJPA (pretty happily I should say). We can't use 0.9.6 > >> > as we need a > >> > > couple of fixes from 0.9.7 so we've been using the snapshot > >> > so far. > >> > > But as > >> > > you know we won't be able to release with it (and generally > >> speaking > >> > > depending on snapshots is not that nice). > >> > > > >> > > So we were just wondering if you had any time frame so far for > >> > > 0.9.7 final. > >> > > I've seen that you started discussing future plans so maybe 0.9.7 > >> > > should > >> > > happen soon enough? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Matthieu > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may > >> contain > >> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and > >> affiliated > >> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted > >> and/or > >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the > >> individual or > >> entity named in this message. If you are not the intended > >> recipient, and > >> have received this message in error, please immediately return > >> this by email > >> and then delete it. > >> > > Craig Russell > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > ------=_Part_22367_3464313.1175045895367--