Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-open-jpa-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 82595 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2007 17:08:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2007 17:08:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 6276 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2007 17:08:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-open-jpa-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6251 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2007 17:08:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact open-jpa-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6242 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2007 17:08:46 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:08:46 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ekoneil@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.184] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:08:36 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d4so1544538nfe for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:08:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IClzD/+ASKhbryifwkw0IF4ysAdPTESYEhFIqPBoCVQMH/bJQcsrWLce7i69gO5k89TrNM1F3uhjjrkzluJZLH6HgtWAjk2t4ROmV1gdxehfS1BeB/tdt+S7sEhFA6cjnM65KN2xEDDnwh1XkVm99Dm5WZahjH0MyTGBGPw1LhA= Received: by 10.82.163.13 with SMTP id l13mr7275627bue.1171127294164; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:08:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.191.11 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:08:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:08:14 -0700 From: "Eddie O'Neil" To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move JPA API dependency from dev.java.net to geronimo version In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On 2/9/07, Craig L Russell wrote: > +1 > > My vote is as much related to dissatisfaction with the maven repo > that is used by glassfish as with the time it takes to get anything > done through official channels. > > Craig > > On Feb 8, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > > > > It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against (the one > > from https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/ > > javax.persistence/jars/persistence-api-1.0.jar) is not actually the > > final version of the spec: there are some minor (and binary- > > compatible) changes (some annotations don't have runtime retention, > > for example), but they are enough to prevent us from passing all > > the compatibility tests we need. > > > > The Geronimo API jar (http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/ > > org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec/geronimo- > > jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar) is compliant, as far as I can tell. > > > > How do people feel about changing the dependency from persistence- > > api-1.0.jar to geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar? I've run through all > > our tests, and they pass with the Geronimo version. This would have > > the added advantage of unifying our spec jars to all be using the > > Geronimo versions. > > > > +1 indicates that you approve of the change > > -1 indicated that you disagree that the change should be made > > > > > > > > > > > > Craig Russell > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > >