Mailing-List: contact open-jpa-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of kwsutter@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.233 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=TsTnnEQsy9gsD8Guwb/1y3GDtJFqYyla8clChAHwkehGn7d6++6FJtu1RKHhh5KnUNKJMELmBUO/eeDVc7fbM5AtnSVyuwuxtDXSRpGL2IKSjulbXXIodrObktRjjQ2drwqyDKMnGFo+6B694PI1qeYHf4T8Xlo2X7hVkV3lYnk=
Message-ID: <89c0c52c0702011139q295a1e74h40b65de94a30f1e6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:39:18 -0600
From: "Kevin Sutter" <kwsutter@gmail.com>
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to TestNG?
In-Reply-To: <1C82AB4A-C571-43CF-AE98-12B59C782502@iq80.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_3591_16386022.1170358758025"
References: <7D856CDFE035FF45A0420ACBD71BDD63031EA2DD@repbex02.amer.bea.com>
	 <1C82AB4A-C571-43CF-AE98-12B59C782502@iq80.com>

------=_Part_3591_16386022.1170358758025
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I see that they have a plugin for Eclipse, but I haven't tried it yet.  It
doesn't look like it supports IntelliJ.  On the surface, the conversion and
usage looks doable and would satisfy the "failed testcase" problem.

My question is whether it's worth the effort.  If we have a testcase that
has failures, write appropriate JIRA reports, and comment out the failing
variations until they get resolved.  As part of the JIRA resolution, you
uncomment the failing test variations.

Even if we go with TestNG, it's a similar process.  We discover a problem,
write a JIRA report, and put the testcase in a special group that allows
failures.  When the JIRA report is resolved, we move the testcase to a
regular group where it is not allowed to fail.

Kevin

On 2/1/07, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
>
> My only concern is IDE support and specifically the IDE I use
> intellij.  Does this work as a test case type in IntelliJ and Eclipse?
>
> If so, I don't really care which framework we use.
>
> -dain
>
> On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to the discussion at
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-123, it looks like
> > TestNG's concept of test groups could let us easily create tests that
> > are expected to fail, and exclude them from test runs until the
> > corresponding behavior is fixed / feature is implemented. What do you
> > guys think about moving to TestNG? I believe that the work involved is
> > minimal; there are some conversion tools / compatibility modes or
> > something.
> >
> > -Patrick
> >
> > --
> > Patrick Linskey
> > BEA Systems, Inc.
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
> > contain
> > information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
> > affiliated
> > entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
> > and/or
> > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> > individual
> > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> > recipient,
> > and have received this message in error, please immediately return
> > this
> > by email and then delete it.
>
>

------=_Part_3591_16386022.1170358758025--