Mailing-List: contact open-jpa-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of jim.cullison@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=Z1ImXM2+zDiOvuvqhtg7AzldHPd7px5U4qLeh3XxKBj5r373EROzu7towjLB5em8frkEQCqQsu9QwiMlAraINivQjqC2qS8YK3t5eqtExFOvUzsd3Mq0JDR1FuOAQNtHeZyzQWRDRuDsZqmsvYpX5pbik+ReE87l0quKl30jI4A=
Message-ID: <391ef40c0702011220l752c052ftc414cad2e53d309e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:20:42 -0700
From: "Jim Cullison" <jim.cullison@gmail.com>
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to TestNG?
In-Reply-To: <89c0c52c0702011139q295a1e74h40b65de94a30f1e6@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_8075_5461909.1170361242294"
References: <7D856CDFE035FF45A0420ACBD71BDD63031EA2DD@repbex02.amer.bea.com>
	 <1C82AB4A-C571-43CF-AE98-12B59C782502@iq80.com>
	 <89c0c52c0702011139q295a1e74h40b65de94a30f1e6@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_8075_5461909.1170361242294
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I am using TestNG with IntelliJ.  See http://testng.org/doc/idea.html  (I
don't use OpenJPA yet, but I plan to on a personal project so I'm reading
the list).  My project uses Apache MINA and TestNG has been good for working
with that backbone.  One feature that comes to mind is the timeout property
on the Test tag: @Test(timeOut = x).

There is a tool (http://testng.org/doc/migrating.html) that automates
converting JUnit tests to TestNG.

Jim Cullison

On 2/1/07, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I see that they have a plugin for Eclipse, but I haven't tried it yet.  It
> doesn't look like it supports IntelliJ.  On the surface, the conversion
> and
> usage looks doable and would satisfy the "failed testcase" problem.
>
> My question is whether it's worth the effort.  If we have a testcase that
> has failures, write appropriate JIRA reports, and comment out the failing
> variations until they get resolved.  As part of the JIRA resolution, you
> uncomment the failing test variations.
>
> Even if we go with TestNG, it's a similar process.  We discover a problem,
> write a JIRA report, and put the testcase in a special group that allows
> failures.  When the JIRA report is resolved, we move the testcase to a
> regular group where it is not allowed to fail.
>
> Kevin
>
> On 2/1/07, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
> >
> > My only concern is IDE support and specifically the IDE I use
> > intellij.  Does this work as a test case type in IntelliJ and Eclipse?
> >
> > If so, I don't really care which framework we use.
> >
> > -dain
> >
> > On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > According to the discussion at
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-123, it looks like
> > > TestNG's concept of test groups could let us easily create tests that
> > > are expected to fail, and exclude them from test runs until the
> > > corresponding behavior is fixed / feature is implemented. What do you
> > > guys think about moving to TestNG? I believe that the work involved is
> > > minimal; there are some conversion tools / compatibility modes or
> > > something.
> > >
> > > -Patrick
> > >
> > > --
> > > Patrick Linskey
> > > BEA Systems, Inc.
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________________
> > > _
> > > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
> > > contain
> > > information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
> > > affiliated
> > > entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
> > > and/or
> > > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> > > individual
> > > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> > > recipient,
> > > and have received this message in error, please immediately return
> > > this
> > > by email and then delete it.
> >
> >
>
>

------=_Part_8075_5461909.1170361242294--