openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-141) More performance improvements (in response to changes for OPENJPA-138)
Date Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:40:12 GMT
Hi Kevin,

On Feb 13, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Kevin Sutter (JIRA) wrote:

> Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-141:
> --------------------------------------
> Personally, I think I provide sufficient due diligence on the  
> Issues that I own to stick with the normal "commit then review"  
> approach.  There are many, many changes that get incorporated into  
> OpenJPA without even a JIRA Issue discussion.  So, until I totally  
> screw up,

I don't expect that any committer is going to "totally screw up", and  
I hope you don't take my comments as accusing you of such. But this  
issue seems to be full of interesting nuances that might better be  
discussed before the fact.

This issue is already the result of a commit with serious issues  
raised against it after the fact. So I'm a bit perplexed at the  
emotional reaction to my request to separate this steer from the herd.

> I'm going along with Patrick's comment and will do my normal commit  
> with the JIRA Issue in the comment field.

Certainly this is your choice.

Just one final comment. The Apache Way calls for thorough and public  
discussion on contentious issues, and this is complicated  
substantially by having the appearance of "shadow implementers", as  
reflected in your comments in the original JIRA: "I will be working  
with Abe and my performance team to work through these issues".

>> More performance improvements (in response to changes for  
>> OPENJPA-138)
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> -
>>                 Key: OPENJPA-141
>>                 URL: 
>> OPENJPA-141

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
408 276-5638
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

View raw message