openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Patrick Linskey (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-161) Overuse of synchronization in AbstractBrokerFactory
Date Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:00:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475372
] 

Patrick Linskey commented on OPENJPA-161:
-----------------------------------------

Oops, FIXME is stale -- the comment is no longer applicable. Disregard. (In an earlier revision,
I was guarding 'brokers' with a synchronized block, but analyzed further and decided that
indeed, it was not necessary.)

> Overuse of synchronization in AbstractBrokerFactory
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-161
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-161
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: kernel
>            Reporter: Patrick Linskey
>         Attachments: openjpa-161-patch.txt
>
>
> AbstractBrokerFactory maintains a Map<Transaction,List<Broker>> that is guarded
by synchronized blocks. These synchronized blocks should be removed if possible.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message