Hi David,

Thanks again for listening to our request for 1.3 jars.

Craig

On Dec 28, 2006, at 1:38 PM, David Blevins wrote:

>
> On Dec 21, 2006, at 12:19 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 27, 2006, at 8:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>> When can Geronimo ship an upgrade to JTA 1.1 that we can use and  
>>> compile with 1.3?
>>>
>>> These are "goodness" that I think OpenJPA can use.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, so it's taken me a while to get this done, but I've got our  
>> JTA 1.1 and JPA specs ready for release and up for vote.
>>
>> The JPA spec jar had some compliance issues which I fixed:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-scm/200612.mbox/% 
>> 3c20061221041508.72F661A981A@eris.apache.org%3e
>>
>> The JTA spec jar was fine.
>>
>> Assuming those votes pass, I'll publish them both and the JTA jar  
>> with jdk 1.3 as requested -- ensuring the "goodness" is locked in :)
>>
>
> FYI, the specs are final and available should you want them.
>
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo- 
> jta_1.1_spec/1.0/
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo- 
> jpa_3.0_spec/1.0/
>
> And the jta jar was compiled with jdk 1.3.
>
> -David
>
>
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!