openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kevin Sutter" <kwsut...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?
Date Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:39:54 GMT
Thanks, Patrick.  I hadn't even realized that we had that specified in the
pom.xml.  Learn something new everyday with this project...  :-)

Kevin

On 11/10/06, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@bea.com> wrote:
>
> I just removed the openjpa-kernel-4 module (moved its contents to
> openjpa-kernel) and change the poms to use JDK1.4 as the source and
> target instead of 1.3.
>
> -Patrick
>
> --
> Patrick Linskey
> BEA Systems, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
> by email and then delete it.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kevin Sutter [mailto:kwsutter@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 7:28 AM
> > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?
> >
> > Although we have started to process as if JDK 1.3 is no
> > longer supported, I
> > recently realized that I never published the results of the vote...
> >
> > +1        4 votes (including my and Patrick's implicit votes)
> > +/- 0     1 vote
> > -1         0 votes
> >
> > Thus, OpenJPA will only focus on support of JDK 1.4 and
> > beyond.  Thanks.
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > On 10/25/06, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > A recent discussion concerning a patch for OPENJPA-63
> > (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63
> > >
> > >
> > <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments
> > #action_12444414>)
> > > has prompted a question that Patrick and I felt should be
> > brought out into a
> > > public discussion.  It turns out that the patch posted for
> > this report is
> > > using a method on DelegatingDatabaseMetaData that was
> > introduced in JDK
> > > 1.4.  Patrick's original concern is that we should continue
> > to support JDK
> > > 1.3.  Since JDK 1.3 has started it's EOL campaign, I'm wondering how
> > > important it is to continue to support JDK 1.3.  My thought (and now
> > > Patrick's) is that we should focus on JDK 1.4 and above.
> > Here's your
> > > chance to vote...
> > >
> > > Statement:  OpenJPA should support JDK 1.4 and beyond.  There is no
> > > requirement to support the older JDK 1.3 environment.
> > >
> > > +1     Agree. JDK 1.4 and beyond
> > > -1      Disagree.  We need to support JDK 1.3.
> > > +/- 0  Neutral.  Do whatever.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kevin
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message