openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Patrick Linskey" <plins...@bea.com>
Subject RE: Two more release artifacts for next time
Date Thu, 23 Nov 2006 05:48:55 GMT
Do we care about supporting Maven 1 artifacts?

I know nothing about maven, including what versions people use out there. My
uneducated opinion is that we should not do extra work for old-version
support if we can get away with it.

-Patrick

-- 
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc. 

_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 9:26 PM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Two more release artifacts for next time
> 
> Yes. In maven1, you need the everything jar or you have to declare  
> all of openjpa's dependencies. In maven2, you need just the openjpa  
> jar and its pom declares its own dependencies.
> 
> Craig
> 
> On Nov 22, 2006, at 5:45 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
> 
> > Shouldn't Maven have some way to just do that declaratively, so  
> > that the
> > Maven framework can go and fetch the other dependencies?
> >
> > -Patrick
> >
> > -- 
> > Patrick Linskey
> > BEA Systems, Inc.
> >
> > 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ________ 
> > _
> > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may  
> > contain
> > information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and   
> > affiliated
> > entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted   
> > and/or
> > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the  
> > individual
> > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended  
> > recipient,
> > and have received this message in error, please immediately return  
> > this
> > by email and then delete it.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 5:43 PM
> >> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: Two more release artifacts for next time
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'd like to propose distributing two artifacts in addition to
> >> the binary and source releases we already are voting on.
> >>
> >> The two artifacts are the "complete with dependencies" jar
> >> and the "everything openjpa" jar. This way, folks who use
> >> maven (either 1 or 2) can take advantage of the dependency
> >> downloads that maven is famous for.
> >>
> >> Simply, if a user has a maven project they can add openjpa as
> >> a dependency and they are done.
> >>
> >> Craig
> >>
> >> Craig Russell
> >> clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message