openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Patrick Linskey" <plins...@bea.com>
Subject RE: [RESULT][VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?
Date Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:49:07 GMT
I just removed the openjpa-kernel-4 module (moved its contents to
openjpa-kernel) and change the poms to use JDK1.4 as the source and
target instead of 1.3.

-Patrick

-- 
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc. 

_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Sutter [mailto:kwsutter@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 7:28 AM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?
> 
> Although we have started to process as if JDK 1.3 is no 
> longer supported, I
> recently realized that I never published the results of the vote...
> 
> +1        4 votes (including my and Patrick's implicit votes)
> +/- 0     1 vote
> -1         0 votes
> 
> Thus, OpenJPA will only focus on support of JDK 1.4 and 
> beyond.  Thanks.
> 
> Kevin
> 
> On 10/25/06, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > A recent discussion concerning a patch for OPENJPA-63 
> (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63
> >
> > 
> <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments
> #action_12444414>)
> > has prompted a question that Patrick and I felt should be 
> brought out into a
> > public discussion.  It turns out that the patch posted for 
> this report is
> > using a method on DelegatingDatabaseMetaData that was 
> introduced in JDK
> > 1.4.  Patrick's original concern is that we should continue 
> to support JDK
> > 1.3.  Since JDK 1.3 has started it's EOL campaign, I'm wondering how
> > important it is to continue to support JDK 1.3.  My thought (and now
> > Patrick's) is that we should focus on JDK 1.4 and above.  
> Here's your
> > chance to vote...
> >
> > Statement:  OpenJPA should support JDK 1.4 and beyond.  There is no
> > requirement to support the older JDK 1.3 environment.
> >
> > +1     Agree. JDK 1.4 and beyond
> > -1      Disagree.  We need to support JDK 1.3.
> > +/- 0  Neutral.  Do whatever.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kevin
> >
> 

Mime
View raw message