openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: openjpa.Id property
Date Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:49:58 GMT
Hi Patrick,

I don't think there would be an issue with calling it unitName or  
persistenceUnitName, as in getUnitName() or getPersistenceUnitName().  
It will be common for people to try to figure out what the Id  
property from a Configuration really means so the more help we give  
them the easier it will be to remember.


Maybe I'm missing something obvious...


On Nov 9, 2006, at 2:19 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:

> Hi,
> It's useful in a number of places to get an identifier for a  
> particular
> Configuration. For example, as we discussed a few months ago, it would
> be useful if the logging subsystem automatically wrote the persistence
> unit's ID along with log messages if no such ID was specified in  
> the log
> configuration.
> Any objections to such an addition? In a JPA environment, this would
> correspond to the persistence unit's unitName attribute.
> Any suggestions for a better name than openjpa.Id for the property?  
> This
> would result in an OpenJPAConfiguration.getId() method call that
> returned a String.
> -Patrick
> -- 
> Patrick Linskey
> BEA Systems, Inc.
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> _
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may  
> contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and   
> affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted   
> and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the  
> individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended  
> recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return  
> this
> by email and then delete it.

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
408 276-5638
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

View raw message