Mailing-List: contact open-jpa-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: version number increment
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:25:20 -0700
Message-ID: <7D856CDFE035FF45A0420ACBD71BDD63022B5C2C@repbex02.amer.bea.com>
Thread-Topic: version number increment
Thread-Index: AcbppxKLdVlzII/oR1mPT88emeC4bA==
From: "Patrick Linskey" <plinskey@bea.com>
To: <open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org>

Hi,

We (BEA) are going to be releasing a new version of Kodo based on the
OpenJPA jars at some point soon. We'd kinda like to bump up the version
number to 0.9.1 along with the build that we're using; any objections to
this?

Actually, I can't remember what the maven convention is. Is
0.9.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT something that is building towards 0.9.0, or
something that is built on top of 0.9.0?=20

If the former, then we'd like to change the version number to
0.9.0-incubating at the time of release and move it to
0.9.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT immediately afterwards.=20

If the latter, then we'd like to change the version number to
0.9.1-incubating at the time of release and move it to
0.9.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT immediately afterwards.

-Patrick

--=20
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.=20

_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.