I've used Wikis for a couple of years now and I agree with Patrick that the
ease of editting is a big plus. I vote +1 for a wiki-based "Site".
On 7/29/06, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@bea.com> wrote:
>
> > Personally, I think that we should use a wiki-based approach
> > for most of The Site, as Craig refers to it, and use a
> > mvn-based build approach for The Product Docs.
>
> So the reason that I prefer a wiki-based approach is ease of editing.
> Currently, editing content on the site is a multi-step process, and
> basically requires someone to be relatively developery. I'd like to be
> able to see an error or have an idea for a quick bit of info or
> something and just put it up there quickly, and I'd like it if
> non-tech-folks could easily add content (conference schedules, new white
> papers, customer testimonials, etc.).
>
> -Patrick
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
> by email and then delete it.
>
|