openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Improving the Maven story for GlassFish
Date Mon, 19 Jun 2006 02:41:19 GMT
I'd strongly suggest that more than just I subscribe to the glassfish  
dev alias[1]. There is some discussion on how to package such things  
as the spec jars, and as an outside open source project considering  
using the spec jars from the Glassfish project, more voices need to  
be heard.

I'll forward some context to this alias.


On Jun 18, 2006, at 5:36 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:

>>> I meant that there isn't much IP in the spec jars, so it's
>> basically
>>> wasted time if the spec jars are available under a
>> compatible license.
>> Agreed, but what if Geronimo already has them?
> Because although there isn't much IP in the spec jars, there is
> behavior. There are a handful of classes. IOW, they're not just
> interfaces. I'd rather we keep consistent behavior, rather than  
> rely on
> the completeness of the TCK. Without a compelling reason to use
> something other than the Glassfish ones, I can't imagine why we'd  
> choose
> to do anything else.
> -Patrick
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> _
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may  
> contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and   
> affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted   
> and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the  
> individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended  
> recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return  
> this
> by email and then delete it.

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
408 276-5638
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

View raw message