openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Patrick Linskey" <>
Subject RE: Improving the Maven story for GlassFish
Date Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:36:19 GMT
> > I meant that there isn't much IP in the spec jars, so it's 
> basically 
> > wasted time if the spec jars are available under a 
> compatible license.
> Agreed, but what if Geronimo already has them?

Because although there isn't much IP in the spec jars, there is
behavior. There are a handful of classes. IOW, they're not just
interfaces. I'd rather we keep consistent behavior, rather than rely on
the completeness of the TCK. Without a compelling reason to use
something other than the Glassfish ones, I can't imagine why we'd choose
to do anything else.

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.

View raw message