Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-open-jpa-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 44048 invoked from network); 16 May 2006 14:44:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 May 2006 14:44:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 14748 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2006 14:44:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-open-jpa-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 14728 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2006 14:44:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact open-jpa-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 14719 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2006 14:44:57 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 07:44:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of michael.d.dick@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.189] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 07:44:56 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p48so117604nfa for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 07:44:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=dd1NFts7BT4lwmyn4wklX0yZo4QGWMyOrqoUp6Tc9+1z7c0wzEjVS/82vZNtxtCC1EYhfuBySEbdia9O15SY358lyzuQSlwWSddUsc9LcO0q1NaOlx5cEx+WcbqbB40npJVRu7KfD1AniqK/0wVEkkPY8VN8xfatRqZki4sGjiQ= Received: by 10.49.12.15 with SMTP id p15mr2555965nfi; Tue, 16 May 2006 07:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.19.2 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 07:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <72c1350f0605160744t3a3a28a3jb8a28f127dff26e3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:44:35 -0500 From: "Michael Dick" To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: initial commit In-Reply-To: <7D856CDFE035FF45A0420ACBD71BDD630115A72A@repbex02.amer.bea.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_81665_6359391.1147790675455" References: <7D856CDFE035FF45A0420ACBD71BDD630115A72A@repbex02.amer.bea.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_81665_6359391.1147790675455 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Regarding Maven, Are we considering using Maven 1, or Maven 2? The dependencies from Craig'= s email work with Maven 2, but I'm just curious whether we have a consensus o= n which version to use (if we go with Maven). -Mike On 5/15/06, Patrick Linskey wrote: > > > So, what is the @nojavadoc concept? That these classes are so > > simple that javadoc would be meaningless? > > That these clasess are things that are just noise in a javadoc release > set. > > -Patrick > _______________________________________________________________________ > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated > entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, > and have received this message in error, please immediately return this > by email and then delete it. > > > -- -Michael Dick ------=_Part_81665_6359391.1147790675455--