openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Patrick Linskey" <plins...@bea.com>
Subject RE: initial commit
Date Tue, 30 May 2006 16:12:52 GMT
Hi Craig,

Any further thoughts about maven and multiple language versions?

-Patrick

-- 
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 5:17 PM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: initial commit
> 
> I've been told that "if you're already using maven 1, and it 
> works, there's not much value in switching, but if you're 
> starting a new project, you might as well  use maven 2." by 
> the maven mavens.
> 
> So I'd probably be in favor of maven 2 since we're starting 
> from scratch.
> 
> The question has come up whether maven can handle some files 
> in a project being dependent on JDK 1.4 and some on 1.5 but 
> most being simply 1.3. I'm going to ask the maven experts 
> here at Java One about ways of handling this. It would be 
> easier if I had some real examples of the code that hasn't 
> been checked in yet...
> 
> Craig
> 
> On May 16, 2006, at 7:44 AM, Michael Dick wrote:
> 
> > Regarding Maven,
> >
> > Are we considering using Maven 1, or Maven 2?  The 
> dependencies from 
> > Craig's email work with Maven 2, but I'm just curious 
> whether we have 
> > a consensus on which version to use (if we go with Maven).
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > On 5/15/06, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@bea.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > So, what is the @nojavadoc concept? That these classes are so 
> >> > simple that javadoc would be meaningless?
> >>
> >> That these clasess are things that are just noise in a javadoc 
> >> release set.
> >>
> >> -Patrick
> >> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> >> __
> >> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may 
> >> contain
> >> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and   
> >> affiliated
> >> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted   
> >> and/or
> >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the 
> >> individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the 
> >> intended recipient, and have received this message in 
> error, please 
> >> immediately return this by email and then delete it.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> > -Michael Dick
> 
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> 
> 
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.

Mime
View raw message