Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openejb-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openejb-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 294EFD2D6 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:29:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18437 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2012 15:29:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openejb-users-archive@openejb.apache.org Received: (qmail 18418 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2012 15:29:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openejb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openejb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openejb.apache.org Received: (qmail 18405 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2012 15:29:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:29:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rmannibucau@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vc0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:29:07 +0000 Received: by vcbfl11 with SMTP id fl11so3047146vcb.35 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:28:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=CJwUi9MbTpQjQTxY+EbnZJDyOmdvScwPC7h2a0DtWLQ=; b=L4G+M8jLq8r/MRezaFwxnnvIjVov41wkGbUos7kBO67nK9+o8arIbf3UvfJg2m62vm n5LNUszg5RrX2UPRZ6or/nu9j6odECoL48XoQr6/SHAIbYEjBBAUYIAP05hfACGzQ/x5 OlPruGeAV8LSwBanLwS2/xA3v1O2yFnhWEnKmbp8c7q77KMFd+pnj6xbR1wamXVn/IAo u0DX9CgNwXsZ7WAxpN2PEIbG7rKBiQeNe2LipNWv+keHYcEKEFYJ7cBKHcZjBF4kz6Kn zcgcZMz6EW5JKGupJEm4ZFXXpD0ibwW57tGaOYePzdtUKSgtRlhGpX4f7ywKbUj/bQWU //Yg== Received: by 10.52.69.233 with SMTP id h9mr4673489vdu.0.1344698926570; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:28:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.216.162 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:28:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1344698613704-4656805.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1344693810324-4656801.post@n4.nabble.com> <1344697132909-4656803.post@n4.nabble.com> <1344698613704-4656805.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Romain Manni-Bucau Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:28:26 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Strange MDB invocation behavior To: users@openejb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307c9f0cd91d1c04c6ff1d0e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307c9f0cd91d1c04c6ff1d0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 i have not it in mind but i think AMQ has a kind of check interval parameter - Romain 2012/8/11 almos > We thought of network issue as well but it also reproduces in the case when > TomEE and ActiveMQ are on the same host. > For us it also seems like a kind of hibernation, when 1-st message awakes > some hibernated component and then it becomes alive again but first message > gets lost. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Strange-MDB-invocation-behavior-tp4656801p4656805.html > Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --20cf307c9f0cd91d1c04c6ff1d0e--