Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openejb-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openejb-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FE1DD4B4 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93493 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2012 13:54:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openejb-users-archive@openejb.apache.org Received: (qmail 93470 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2012 13:54:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openejb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openejb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openejb.apache.org Received: (qmail 93461 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2012 13:54:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:54:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rmannibucau@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vc0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:54:37 +0000 Received: by vcbfl11 with SMTP id fl11so8322753vcb.35 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 06:54:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=CbBJM68ymycHZYvKY83ue1wS/ILVG4Yyj/NgCtIYz4M=; b=Q21W2wiMAfOxsO9X+ZbPuISBM/fcb9spIZvQTep5phW2OHlkevFhX9RTbgAAyjG6oM B4RIvDuYGj/N6HXNbzZfiAo0lyVenOEPK6dV9U+n0rdtBp6jLeWDh+R+pm/CsRmEp/8U 58+bFz/b+bxSOcdejpoRZ7ZlI8WoxKLWpE/ELo7ApBVNqQ3OJKP6MoD2vGMslqhAMtA5 /xyJooJ9AfYdRw0TAHOgWScmbzywfqIu2RGuXNJmQ8q0Jy12S9I6f6bVuBIF+PWGhDCZ IjVjA5XIsRFLVkZXm55EQP5H2iFIvR4UJW/LJgKLVo2V1X95VudqR/Yyk/xYpdxpwUiT LyJw== Received: by 10.52.98.3 with SMTP id ee3mr9806087vdb.127.1343829256862; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 06:54:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.171.237 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 06:53:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1343829101112-4656616.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1343773708361-4656610.post@n4.nabble.com> <1343829101112-4656616.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Romain Manni-Bucau Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:53:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: tomEE with OpenJPA meta class problems To: users@openejb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f34b07e7a9d04c634a175 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307f34b07e7a9d04c634a175 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hmm, meta classes and enhanced classes are different things. Typically you should get more classes. A way to do it is to generated meta classes then add them to maven src/main/java. But we often generate them in generated-sources *before* the compilation. - Romain 2012/8/1 vmix > Thanks... I am indeed using maven, and I have confirmed that the class was > enhanced. I see the added OpenJpa code in the actual .class file. But > nonetheless I get the same error from TomEE. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/tomEE-with-OpenJPA-meta-class-problems-tp4656610p4656616.html > Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --20cf307f34b07e7a9d04c634a175--