Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openejb-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openejb-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABA1EDCA9 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:44:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46862 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2012 11:44:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openejb-users-archive@openejb.apache.org Received: (qmail 46183 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2012 11:44:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openejb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openejb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openejb.apache.org Received: (qmail 46150 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2012 11:44:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 11:44:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rmannibucau@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vb0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 11:44:31 +0000 Received: by vbjk17 with SMTP id k17so4305521vbj.35 for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 04:44:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=zoj3URAW/MOR2zMInzlAd2lYIXIc1KccM8u1pRAgyvg=; b=BZIcwVdIZST7s89ZLnGFpRgsPKWIfdA5DQHFbUaOdAljkB5EXNIoyFJlJ141ZNUPir OXoYfHt2euIg4g9Xtb7TjkDNOyAqolzKrUBSJFRgIIhD3HmJ1Vyxlqo3WUmbEpKf8nQS Xov7uFeN99FO3HqgOCyHKqsAnhvhF9mF5e+sF9Q1YpcfzjzUgkvMcrgsOXNk6RC+YvG+ J+YFwCtZ2ci/zx5tK5vSnauvjVbZAJplEqj5wyenATL4YU4ejBLHkdEaAIX0WISXImxu k51PgZPZfA1Ot4vIeHcdsZiJ7tDi2DvUEd9odHt5t5KVddDefmsgAqs2y6Vx7vwK7gYU yLZw== Received: by 10.220.107.15 with SMTP id z15mr10694798vco.36.1344339850119; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 04:44:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.171.237 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 04:43:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1344336971532-4656688.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1343824875638-4656614.post@n4.nabble.com> <1343837865998-4656620.post@n4.nabble.com> <1344336971532-4656688.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Romain Manni-Bucau Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:43:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NoModulesFoundException - Problem To: users@openejb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c7ba4394b5704c6ab838d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d043c7ba4394b5704c6ab838d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hmm no more idea with a sample to reproduce the error not sure i get your right, you speak about EJBContainer.createContainer() and lib/...seems not so logical to me - Romain 2012/8/7 snblim > Hi Romain, > > the uber-jar does not contain all classes that are being used. For instance > some interface-classes that are in the uber-jar, are being implemented in > classes that are contained in other jars, located in the \lib. > > But that should not be the reason for the problem, because all classes are > being loaded into the classloader (see shell-script), right? > > To put everything in a single jar would kind of interfere with our > architecture :-) > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/NoModulesFoundException-Problem-tp4656614p4656688.html > Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --f46d043c7ba4394b5704c6ab838d--