openejb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jean-louis.monte...@atosorigin.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.1.2
Date Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:35:32 GMT

As far as I know, all votes are welcome.

Jean-Louis



Quintin Beukes-2 wrote:
> 
> Just as a note, the problem I mentioned wasn't one of OpenEJB, so it's
> not a -1 vote. It was definitely network related - probably the
> transparent proxies of my ISP.
> 
> If it counts, here's my vote: +1
> 
> Quintin Beukes
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
> <jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've run the tests against JDK 1.6.0_16 on Ubuntu 9.04 (x64) and JDK
>> 1.6.0_13 on Windows XP. Everything completed successfully for me (I
>> didn't
>> see the problem Quintin did, but I did have it last time around, where I
>> ran
>> the script a few times on a couple of machines simultaneously... I
>> guessed
>> it was some network issue or something at the time).
>>
>> I've run RAT over the source, and checked the LICENSE/NOTICE files and
>> haven't spotted any problems, so it looks good to me.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Quintin Beukes
>> <quintin@skywalk.co.za>wrote:
>>
>>> test:all ran fine here in both JDK1.5.0_17 and JDK1.6.0_11 on Ubuntu
>>> 8.04 - Linux quintin-desktop 2.6.24-24-386 #1 Tue Jun 30 19:54:55 UTC
>>> 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>> I also compiled and ran our unit tests against it for all our projects
>>> that use 3.1.2, and they ran fine as well. About 150 tests which test
>>> remote+local EJBs, multiple persistence units, stateless + singleton
>>> beans, security, and a bunch of other stuff. Not all OpenEJBs
>>> features, but a fare set of them.
>>>
>>> So over here it seems good.
>>>
>>> I did notice a peculiar behavior from the tomcat download server
>>> though. It doesn't feed me more than 4.8mb for any download. As soon
>>> as it reaches between 4800k and 4900k (not fixed, random) it fails and
>>> the download had to stop/resume. So I had to make a script that uses
>>> wget to predownload them, else the ant builds kept failing. Nothing
>>> bad, just thought I'd share this as it was a pretty fascinating
>>> "oddity".
>>>
>>> Quintin Beukes
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:34 PM, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Ok, we have binaries!
>>> >
>>> > Repo:
>>> >
>>> >  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/openejb-014
>>> >
>>> > Binaries:
>>> >
>>> >
>>>  http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.1.2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edblevins/stage/3.1.2/>
>>> >
>>> > Branch (to become a tag):
>>> >
>>> >  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/branches/openejb-3.1.2/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > And so you can test out the binaries, here's an updated ant script as
>>> usual:
>>> >
>>> >
>>>  http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/build.xml<http://people.apache.org/%7Edblevins/stage/build.xml>
>>> >
>>> >  "ant test:all"
>>> >
>>> > Things look good on osx so far, haven't tried windoze yet.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > -David
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--OpenEJB-3.1.2-tp25833260p25860021.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message