openejb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Manu George" <manu.t.geo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 3.0.1 or 3.1? (was: Re: Getting near release time)
Date Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:11:00 GMT
Hmm I see your point David. So I guess it makes sense to go with 3.1.
So what do we plan to call future releases delivering EJB 3.1 support?
3.x or 4.0?

Regards
Manu

On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:00 AM, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
> The drawbacks of beta are:
>  - We're not going to get an announcewill thement out of anyone (InfoQ, TSS) until
> it's a major version.  Don't think we can afford to be that quiet.
>  - betas are "off limits" for a lot of people, so they'll just keep using
> 3.0 final.  But trunk is generally a much improved version of 3.0 (i.e. more
> solid).
>
> David
>
> On Jun 27, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Manu George wrote:
>
>> I see the logic in Karan's suggestion. I would also prefer 3.1 beta.
>> Maybe 3.1 beta1 assuming we may have a beta 2 in the works later
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:11 AM, Karan Malhi <karan.malhi@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was also thinking that 3.1-beta might be an option too. This way we get
>>> to
>>> announce twice, once for 3.1-beta and once for 3.1 . We also get to keep
>>> the
>>> release in sync with EJB 3.1 .
>>> Just a thought, but I guess I am too late in expressing my opinion , as
>>> the
>>> voting already started and most people agree upon EJB 3.1. So, I will
>>> give
>>> my +1 to EJB 3.1 too :) .
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:56 PM, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jun 23, 2008, at 4:35 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We might want to start thinking release pretty soon here.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Another topic is weather or not we want to call this 3.0.1 or 3.1.
>>>>
>>>> I was just talking to one of the guys from InfoQ about the upcoming
>>>> release
>>>> and he definitely liked some of the new features but sort of went cold
>>>> on
>>>> the idea of a news post wanting to wait till 3.1.  Got me thinking that
>>>> maybe 3.0.1 isn't such a wise idea if we really want to get the word out
>>>> there.
>>>>
>>>> If you look at our changes, they're mostly new features and improvements
>>>> with just a few bug fixes.  My thoughts previous to talking with him was
>>>> that we should reserve 3.1 for a more EJB 3.1 packed release.  But
>>>> really we
>>>> already have a few great EJB 3.1 features like the embedded testing
>>>> stuff
>>>> and ejbs in wars.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the right answer is just to go for the gusto and call it OpenEJB
>>>> 3.1
>>>> and get people starting to think of us as EJB 3.1.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Karan Singh Malhi
>>>
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message