openejb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevan Miller <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Date Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:14:58 GMT
As David J noted a week or so back, the svn root at tags/openejb-3.0  
needs to contain a LICENSE and NOTICE file. This is mandatory, IMO.

The NOTICE files in generated jar files, being created using the maven- 
remote-resources-plugin, aren't proper. NOTICE files should only  
contain legally required attributions, not a transitive list of  
dependencies. IMO, they should be updated. However, as long as the  
NOTICE files also contain the required attributions, I would say this  
is probably a decision for the PMC.

The generated WAR file in openejb-itests-web did not contain a license/ 
notice file. The notice files for all itests artifacts should be  
reviewed. I don't have internet access, at the moment, but recall  
noticing a problem. Will take a look, once I'm connected again...

The file container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/ 
oejb3/ has an incorrect src license header. I'll fix on  


On Apr 4, 2008, at 8:51 PM, David Blevins wrote:

> All right.  TCK issues were fixed last night.  Joe kicked off a run  
> early this morning and everything is running clean.  I've also run  
> the itests on standalone and a dozen versions of tomcat and  
> everything looks good there as well.  After three weeks or so, it  
> seems we're at the finish line.
> If there does turn out to be an issue with this build, I think the  
> best game plan would be to still release this and get a 3.0.1 next  
> week.  The 3.0-beta-2 release is good but has a large number of  
> limitations and bugs.  We need to get something out to cover it up.
> And now... the binaries ....!
> Here's my +1
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.  Happy voting!
> -David

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message