oodt-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Mattmann <chris.mattm...@gmail.com>
Subject [DISCUSS] Java 8 Min Version
Date Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:23:33 GMT
I would get some more feedback, 48-72 hours, then go ahead
and switch if there are no objections.

note subject line change.

—
Chris Mattmann
chris.mattmann@gmail.com







On 7/15/16, 10:17 AM, "Tom Barber" <tom.barber@meteorite.bi> wrote:

>Jenkins won't compile with anything older. so, yeah
>
>On 15 Jul 2016 17:46, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <
>chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
>> are you saying we should switch to Java8?
>>
>> If so, I’m fine with that.
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Chief Architect
>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/15/16, 7:14 AM, "Tom Barber" <tom.barber@meteorite.bi> wrote:
>>
>> >Lucene 6.1.0 seems to be min Java 8, which makes it our minimum version.
>> >Personally I don't have a problem with it 6 and 7 are both EOL. If someone
>> >complains vehemently we'll have to downgrade the lucene upgrade.
>>


Mime
View raw message