oodt-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Upgrading Lucene and Solr
Date Wed, 06 Jul 2016 19:30:57 GMT
ACK

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Tom Barber <tom.barber@meteorite.bi> wrote:

> Once avro_rpc is stable, I suggest we rename the branch 2.0-dev or similar
> then branch the branch to uprade solr and lucene outside of that scope so
> we don't destroy the semi working avro upgrades ;)
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Tom Barber <tom.barber@meteorite.bi>
> wrote:
>
> > Coolio!
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Yes I was just telling Paul R. the other day we need to do
> >> this, or we’re DOA. I’ve first hand seen the scalability
> >> issues with Big Translate and DRAT using the old Lucene
> >> library. Let’s get it fixed in 2.x.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Chris
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Tom Barber" <tom.barber@meteorite.bi> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Just throwing this one out there as we're making a bunch of breaking
> >> >changes in 2.0.
> >> >
> >> >Is it worth upgrading Lucene and Solr versions within OODT?
> >> >
> >> >My feeling is that they are both pretty old and whilst we're making
> life
> >> >hard for everyone we might as well go the whole hog and drag them into
> >> the
> >> >21st century, but I'm interested in others opinions.
> >> >
> >> >Chris you have a much better understand about those things than myself.
> >> >
> >> >Tom
> >>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
*Lewis*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message