oodt-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov>
Subject Re: Upgrading Lucene and Solr
Date Sat, 09 Jul 2016 06:18:32 GMT
Yeah we can back port the Lucene part to 1.x

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 8, 2016, at 11:15 PM, Tom Barber <tom.barber@meteorite.bi> wrote:
> 
> yeah there's no reason we can't diff the branch and merge it into 1.0 as
> well
>> On 9 Jul 2016 00:26, "Chris Mattmann" <mattmann@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> awesome!!!
>> 
>> Please backport to 1.x :)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 7/8/16, 3:01 PM, "Tom Barber" <tom.barber@meteorite.bi> wrote:
>>> 
>>> There you go, running commentary over. The filemanager test suite now
>>> passes on Lucene 6, I'll fix up the rest next week.
>>> 
>>> Tom
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Tom Barber <tom.barber@meteorite.bi>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Better than I thought actually:
>>>> 
>>>> Tests in error:
>>>>  TestLuceneQueryCliAction.testClientTransTrueAndFlatProduct:78 »
>>>> CmdLineAction ...
>>>>  TestFileManagerCli.testLuceneQuery:350 » Runtime
>>>> org.apache.oodt.cas.cli.excep...
>>>> 
>>>> Tests run: 221, Failures: 1, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0
>>>> 
>>>> The failure is actually one Avro. So only 2 failing on lucene 6 in the
>> FM.
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Tom Barber <tom.barber@meteorite.bi>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Just FYI:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Doesn't work yet, but I've pushed a lucene branch which is based on 2.0
>>>>> and upgrades lucene to 6.1.0. LuceneCatalog in filemanager has been 75%
>>>>> (guess) converted and tests are half passing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>>>>> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> ACK
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Tom Barber <tom.barber@meteorite.bi>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Once avro_rpc is stable, I suggest we rename the branch 2.0-dev
or
>>>>>> similar
>>>>>>> then branch the branch to uprade solr and lucene outside of that
>> scope
>>>>>> so
>>>>>>> we don't destroy the semi working avro upgrades ;)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Tom Barber <tom.barber@meteorite.bi
>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Coolio!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Chris Mattmann <
>> mattmann@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Yes I was just telling Paul R. the other day we need
to do
>>>>>>>>> this, or we’re DOA. I’ve first hand seen the scalability
>>>>>>>>> issues with Big Translate and DRAT using the old Lucene
>>>>>>>>> library. Let’s get it fixed in 2.x.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Tom Barber" <tom.barber@meteorite.bi>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Just throwing this one out there as we're making
a bunch of
>>>>>> breaking
>>>>>>>>>> changes in 2.0.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Is it worth upgrading Lucene and Solr versions within
OODT?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> My feeling is that they are both pretty old and whilst
we're
>> making
>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>>> hard for everyone we might as well go the whole hog
and drag
>> them
>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> 21st century, but I'm interested in others opinions.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Chris you have a much better understand about those
things than
>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Lewis*
>> 
>> 

Mime
View raw message