oodt-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Cinquini, Luca (398G)" <Luca.Cinqu...@jpl.nasa.gov>
Subject Re: OODT 1.0
Date Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:24:45 GMT
Hi,
	I support this plan as well… A stable release with XML/RPC and switch to AVRO later…
thanks, Luca

> On Jun 14, 2016, at 2:28 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> ACK
> 
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> +1 to release as 1.0 and also to do a press release
>> with Sally
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 6/14/16, 4:19 PM, "Tom Barber" <tom.barber@meteorite.bi> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi folks,
>>> 
>>> Something we've mulled over for a while now is when to call OODT 0.x ->
>> 1.0.
>>> 
>>> Some of us feel we've reached that point, the code base is largely stable
>>> and feels like feature complete enough to call it 1.0, so I would like to
>>> release it.
>>> 
>>> Part of the reasoning for this is we have a number of large changes in the
>>> pipeline, including:
>>> 
>>> Revamped OPSUI
>>> Internal messaging implementation
>>> Replace XMLRPC with Avro
>>> New curation app
>>> A bunch of new file manager backends
>>> 
>>> and more.
>>> 
>>> Releasing 1.0 would allow us to then start work in revamping the trunk to
>>> implement these features, that would include a number of sizeable
>>> architecture changes under the hood.
>>> 
>>> Does anyone have any great argument against releasing 1.0? I figure I
>>> should ask before getting into the release cycle.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> 
>>> Tom
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> *Lewis*


Mime
View raw message